Re: Clarification of charmod-uri

On 2002-04-29 05:49 AM, "Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> wrote:

>> 1) Is there some reason why these Unicode characters cannot be %encoded? I
> The reason I heard was that the I18N group would like the user's original
> character input to be preserved as much as possible.  If %-encoding is
> applied, it's not possible to tell if the user supplied it of the application.

This doesn't make any sense to me. Why would the application introduce
%-encoded characters, and if it did, couldn't it introduce them even if the
URI was not %-encoded?

-- 
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]

Received on Monday, 29 April 2002 14:55:47 UTC