- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 23 Apr 2002 08:53:25 -0500
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 08:16, Dave Beckett wrote: > > If you look at the current defn of URI-refs in N-Triples > > http://www.w3.org/2001/08/rdf-test/#absoluteURI > > you will see that there are no \u or \U escapes allowed > as described in http://www.w3.org/2001/08/rdf-test/#sec-uri-encoding > > This might be a problem for resolving this issue. Er.. this *is* the issue. > I expect I need to change the definition of N-Triples in order to > express a resolution of rdf-charmod-uri since I noticed you (Jeremy) > used examples such as: > <http://example.org/#Andr\u00E9> <owes> "2000" . > > -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0113.html > > which is currently not allowed. It should be allowed just in case we decide to go that way for charmod-uri, and not otherwise. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2002 10:11:08 UTC