- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:23:19 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Jeremy Carroll said: > > > I expect I need to change the definition of N-Triples in order to > > express a resolution of rdf-charmod-uri since I noticed you (Jeremy) > > used examples such as: > > <http://example.org/#Andr\u00E9> <owes> "2000" . > > > > -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0113.html > > > > which is currently not allowed. > > > > Yes, if my proposal is accepted a side effect would be a necessity > of asking the N-triples editor to propose a suitable change to > N-triples. The test cases may then need modification to reflect > that change, (they currently second guess the editor's discretion). We have already approved the 'black charmod-uri tests 1 & 2 [[ 12: Issue: rdf-charmod-literals Discuss test cases in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0016.html See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0016.html DECISION: Black Test Case 1&2 approved ]] -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0112.html (and threw out the grey ones in favour of words in the syntax WD, that I already have added) The issues list reports this as closed So these two tests should be in the test suite and N-Triples thus needs to change. The N-Triples answers to the above tests are not in the above links. Jeremy rewrote them inx http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/att-0116/01-charmod-uri.htm for the i18n wg but the latter are not yet approved, and the discussion has stopped. I'm mostly wondering whether to change the N-Triples language before we make the final decision, since it seems that is the way this is heading. Dave
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2002 10:26:42 UTC