Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty

At 12:33 11/04/2002 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Graham Klyne wrote:
>
> > Looks good.
> >
> > Does this mean that rdfs:contains would be a superproperty of rdf:_1,
> > rdf:_2, etc.?
>
>We've already decided this once. The current editors draft of RDFS has
>rdfs:member, though could do with help giving it a nice precise
>rdfs:comment text. Suggestions welcomed.
>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/Schema/200203/

Sorry about the name confusion Dan.  I've just sent the agenda with this 
on, but am of course happy to change the name.
[...]
>A practical question re RDFS: I need to redo the figures. What is the
>state of the art in tools (ideally Linux, MacOS X also a possibility) for
>creating node'n'arc diagrams suitable for inclusion in specs...?

Oh yes, I'd love to know; can we use svg yet?

Brian

Received on Thursday, 11 April 2002 13:13:49 UTC