w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from April 2002 by author

Aaron Swartz

• Re: Clarification of charmod-uri (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Clarification of charmod-uri (Monday, 29 April)
• Clarification of charmod-uri (Sunday, 28 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Sunday, 28 April)
• Re: Informal f2f in Honolulu? (Sunday, 28 April)
• rdfms-contexts proposed resolution (Sunday, 28 April)
• rdfs-clarify-subClass-and-instance proposed resolution (Sunday, 28 April)
• rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics proposed resolution (Sunday, 28 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Sunday, 28 April)
• Re: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Radically Shrunk RDF Schema (RSRS) (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: Dark triples, motivating examples (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Datatyping in Dublin Core (Friday, 12 April)
• Datatype Draft Comments (Friday, 12 April)
• New I-D: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration (Sunday, 7 April)
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] (Monday, 1 April)

Brian McBride

• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... (Tuesday, 30 April)
• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: test cases review (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Sunday, 28 April)
• The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Sunday, 28 April)
• Re: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy (Sunday, 28 April)
• status update: webont request for dark triples (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: notation for literals (Thursday, 25 April)
• rdf:Alt - status (Thursday, 25 April)
• daml:collection (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: reification terminology question (Thursday, 25 April)
• new issue: rdf-namespace-change (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Fwd: Updates/Changes to Pubrules (Thursday, 25 April)
• test cases review (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Minutes 2002-04-09 (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: notation for literals (Thursday, 25 April)
• doc reviews (Thursday, 25 April)
• rdfms-assertion [was: Re: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT] (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: notation for literals (Thursday, 25 April)
• Fwd: 2003 Technical Plenary DATES: 3-7 March 2003 (Thursday, 25 April)
• Fwd: Updates/Changes to Pubrules (Thursday, 25 April)
• weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-duerst-iri-00.txt (Wednesday, 24 April)
• datatypes WD (Monday, 22 April)
• Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19 (Friday, 19 April)
• A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] (Friday, 19 April)
• Fwd: Request for commitment to review Charmod Last Call #2 (Thursday, 18 April)
• Observers (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Thursday, 18 April)
• Dark Triples (Thursday, 18 April)
• weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-12 (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Friday, 12 April)
• Praise for the primer (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: manifests and words for the test cases. (Friday, 12 April)
• SVG tools: [was Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty] (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-12 (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Completed actions (uri and xquery) (Thursday, 11 April)
• weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-xmllang (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: xml:base and rdf:parseType="Literal" (Monday, 8 April)
• xml:base and rdf:parseType="Literal" (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: Range constraints on collection members (Saturday, 6 April)
• Re: daml:collection (Saturday, 6 April)
• Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-05 (Friday, 5 April)
• Re: appeal for (short) test case review (Friday, 5 April)
• Bristol time is 4pm [was Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-05] (Friday, 5 April)
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers (Friday, 5 April)
• daml:collection (Thursday, 4 April)
• appeal for (short) test case review (Thursday, 4 April)
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers (Thursday, 4 April)
• Issues status update. (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: Charmod-Literal (Thursday, 4 April)

bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com

• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-26 (Thursday, 25 April)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19 (Thursday, 18 April)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19 (Thursday, 18 April)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-12 (Thursday, 11 April)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-05 (Thursday, 4 April)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Schema comments (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: schema (Tuesday, 30 April)
• RDF Schema WD, publication request looming (Tuesday, 30 April)
• RE: comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: schema (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: towards closure of issue: rdf-namespace-change (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo (Friday, 26 April)
• towards closure of issue: rdf-namespace-change (Friday, 26 April)
• comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: new issue: rdf-namespace-change (Friday, 26 April)
• schema (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty: not sure how to finish entailment test (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: RDF Schema WD-in-preparation: snapshot (Monday, 22 April)
• RDF Schema WD-in-preparation: snapshot (Monday, 22 April)
• partially described containers: RDF, WebOnt and XML Protocol (SOAP) designs (Friday, 19 April)
• rdfs schedule (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty (Thursday, 11 April)
• rdfs delay :( (Wednesday, 3 April)
• (draft) minutes from 2002-03-22 teleconf (Wednesday, 3 April)

Dan Connolly

• user-defined datatype (facet) support needed? (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: towards closure of issue: rdf-namespace-change (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: doc reviews (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: schema (Friday, 26 April)
• rdfs-container-membership-superProperty: not sure how to finish entailment test (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: RDF Schema WD-in-preparation: snapshot (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Monday, 22 April)
• datatypes cease-fire violated (Saturday, 20 April)
• addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: best way to write triples (was RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] (Friday, 19 April)
• "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: best way to write triples? (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Dark triples, motivating examples (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Thursday, 11 April)
• advising RDF users about &entities; [was: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD] (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: pinging about rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics tests (Friday, 5 April)

Dave Beckett

• Re: Informal f2f in Honolulu? (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: doc reviews (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: rdf:Alt - status (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: notation for literals (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: notation for literals (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: notation for literals (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Fwd: Updates/Changes to Pubrules (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: RDF Issue rdfms-uri-substructure (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: Test cases added for rdfms-charmod-literals (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Test cases added for rdfms-charmod-literals (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri (Tuesday, 23 April)
• NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Monday, 22 April)
• Comment on RDF datatypes draft (fwd) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: best way to write triples? (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Updated RDF Core tests ( rdf:parseType="Literal" rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Test respository; work remaining. (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Wednesday, 17 April)
• RDF Core tests for rdf:parseType="Literal" (Friday, 12 April)
• Regrets for 2002-04-19 telecon (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (Thursday, 11 April)
• ACTION 2002-04-05#13 done (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-xmllang (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: xml:base and rdf:parseType="Literal" (Monday, 8 April)
• Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach (Friday, 5 April)
• Test Cases for rdfms-xmllang (Friday, 5 April)
• Test cases for rdfms-rdf-names-use (Friday, 5 April)
• Re: appeal for (short) test case review (Thursday, 4 April)

Dominique Hazaël-Massieux

• Re: completion of action 2002-01-11#2 (Thursday, 4 April)

Eric Miller

• Publication of the New Working Draft - RDF Schema (Tuesday, 30 April)
• New Working Draft available: RDF Model Theory (Tuesday, 30 April)
• New Working Drafts available: RDF Test Cases and RDF Primer (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Fwd: Updates/Changes to Pubrules (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-12 (Thursday, 11 April)
• tools (was Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty) (Thursday, 11 April)
• RDFCore WG minutes 2002-04-05 Teleconference (Thursday, 11 April)

Frank Manola

• Re: schema (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: schema (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Primer - review: WG please advise/comment! (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Schema. (fwd) (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: schema (Friday, 26 April)
• schema comments (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: doc reviews (Friday, 26 April)
• Primer status and proposed schedule (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: rdf:Alt - status (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: reification terminology question (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19 (Friday, 19 April)
• Primer status (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: containers: primer material (Tuesday, 16 April)
• containers: primer material (Tuesday, 16 April)

Graham Klyne

• Schema comments (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Primer - review: WG please advise/comment! (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: Clarification of charmod-uri (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: schema (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Primer - review (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Monday, 29 April)
• Reviewing Model Theory (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: status update: webont request for dark triples (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: towards closure of issue: rdf-namespace-change (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Clarification of charmod-uri (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Schema. (fwd) (Monday, 29 April)
• schema vs ontology (Monday, 29 April)
• Minutes for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-26 (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: new issue: rdf-namespace-change (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: notation for literals (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDF Issue rdfms-uri-substructure (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: RDF Issue rdfms-uri-substructure (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Saturday, 20 April)
• Re: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: after hours discussion of dark triples [Was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19] (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] (Friday, 19 April)
• RE: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: containers: primer material (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: RDF datatyping, section 2.1 (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Dark triples, motivating examples (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: containers: primer material (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Dark triples, motivating examples (Tuesday, 16 April)
• RDF datatyping, section 2.1 (Tuesday, 16 April)
• RDF Datatypes: proposal for abstract (Tuesday, 16 April)
• RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-04-12 (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-00.txt (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Proposal submissions (was: Re: Range constraints on collection members) (Saturday, 6 April)
• Re: Issues status update. (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: Issues status update. (Thursday, 4 April)
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers (Thursday, 4 April)
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: (draft) minutes from 2002-03-22 teleconf (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] (Tuesday, 2 April)
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] (Monday, 1 April)
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] (Monday, 1 April)
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] (Monday, 1 April)
• Re: xmlbase error1 (Monday, 1 April)

Jan Grant

• test cases review (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Test Cases WD review (Friday, 26 April)
• Schema. (fwd) (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: doc reviews (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty: not sure how to finish entailment test (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty: not sure how to finish entailment test (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: provisional new MT draft (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: reification terminology question (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: provisional new MT draft (Thursday, 25 April)
• More test case stuff: (Monday, 22 April)
• Test cases WD (Monday, 22 April)
• RE: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: For JOS: another entailment example. Re: Test respository; work remaining. (Wednesday, 17 April)
• For JOS: another entailment example. Re: Test respository; work remaining. (Saturday, 13 April)
• Test respository; work remaining. (Saturday, 13 April)
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach (Friday, 12 April)
• manifests and words for the test cases. (Friday, 12 April)

Jeremy Carroll

• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri (Tuesday, 30 April)
• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri (Tuesday, 30 April)
• RE: comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo (Tuesday, 30 April)
• RE: comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo (Tuesday, 30 April)
• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri (Tuesday, 30 April)
• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri (Monday, 29 April)
• RE: comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo (Friday, 26 April)
• Test Cases WD review (Friday, 26 April)
• RE: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri (Friday, 26 April)
• Charmod (was RE: Minutes 2002-04-09) (Thursday, 25 April)
• RE: notation for literals (Thursday, 25 April)
• RE: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT (Thursday, 25 April)
• Minutes 2002-04-09 (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri (Thursday, 25 April)
• RE: Test cases added for rdfms-charmod-literals (Wednesday, 24 April)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-duerst-iri-00.txt (Wednesday, 24 April)
• RE: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Wednesday, 24 April)
• RE: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri (Tuesday, 23 April)
• RE: NTriples changes for URI-refs - rdf-charmod-uri (Tuesday, 23 April)
• RE: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] (Monday, 22 April)
• RE: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Monday, 22 April)
• best way to write triples (was RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19) (Friday, 19 April)
• RE: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] (Friday, 19 April)
• RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19 (Friday, 19 April)
• RE: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] (Thursday, 18 April)
• RE: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] (Thursday, 18 April)
• RE: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Thursday, 18 April)
• RE: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Wednesday, 17 April)
• RE: charmod-uri (Tuesday, 16 April)
• RE: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• RE: containers: primer material (Tuesday, 16 April)
• RE: charmod-uri (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Dark triples, motivating examples (Monday, 15 April)
• RE: xml:base and rdf:parseType="Literal" (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: charmod-uri (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: charmod-uri (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty (Thursday, 11 April)
• charmod-uri (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (Thursday, 11 April)
• rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Wednesday, 10 April)
• Completed actions (uri and xquery) (Wednesday, 10 April)
• WebOnt F2F news (Wednesday, 10 April)
• containers (Wednesday, 10 April)
• RE: appeal for (short) test case review (Friday, 5 April)
• RE: appeal for (short) test case review (Friday, 5 April)
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. (Friday, 5 April)
• RE: appeal for (short) test case review (Friday, 5 April)
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers (Thursday, 4 April)
• RE: Charmod-Literal (Thursday, 4 April)
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft (Thursday, 4 April)
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft (Thursday, 4 April)
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Charmod-Literal (Wednesday, 3 April)
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Grey test cases (Tuesday, 2 April)

Jos De_Roo

• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Before we go on... (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Thursday, 18 April)
• after hours discussion of dark triples [Was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19] (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: For JOS: another entailment example. Re: Test respository; work remaining. (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Test respository; work remaining. (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Dark triples, motivating examples (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: For JOS: another entailment example. Re: Test respository; work remaining. (Sunday, 14 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-xmllang (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-abouteach (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: manifests and words for the test cases. (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-12 (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: daml:collection (Saturday, 6 April)
• pinging about rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics tests (Friday, 5 April)
• RE: appeal for (short) test case review (Friday, 5 April)
• RE: appeal for (short) test case review (Friday, 5 April)
• Re: appeal for (short) test case review (Friday, 5 April)
• Re: completion of action 2002-01-11#2 (Tuesday, 2 April)

jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... (Tuesday, 30 April)
• RE: Clarification of charmod-uri (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Sunday, 28 April)
• Re: doc reviews (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: new issue: rdf-namespace-change (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: doc reviews (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] (Thursday, 18 April)

Martin Duerst

• Re: charmod-uri (Tuesday, 16 April)

Martyn Horner

• Re: schema (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: doc reviews (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: notation for literals (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Minutes 2002-04-09 (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Test Cases for rdfms-xmllang (Monday, 8 April)

Massimo Marchiori

• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers (Friday, 5 April)
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers (Thursday, 4 April)

Misha.Wolf@reuters.com

• RE: charmod-uri (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: charmod-uri (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: charmod-uri (Thursday, 11 April)

Pat Hayes

• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... (Monday, 29 April)
• RE: comments on syntax wd: bug in graph seriali[zs]ation algo (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: schema (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... (Monday, 29 April)
• better MT draft (Monday, 29 April)
• RE: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Minutes 2002-04-09 (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: provisional new MT draft (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: notation for literals (Thursday, 25 April)
• provisional new MT draft (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 24 April)
• reification terminology question (Wednesday, 24 April)
• notation for literals (Wednesday, 24 April)
• RE: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: suggested wording for removing weasels from MT (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: RDF Schema WD-in-preparation: snapshot (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: RDF Issue rdfms-uri-substructure (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Monday, 22 April)
• suggested wording for removing weasels from MT (Monday, 22 April)
• Re: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-representation) (Saturday, 20 April)
• Re: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] (Saturday, 20 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Saturday, 20 April)
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: best way to write triples? (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: best way to write triples? (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: "asserted triple" weasle-words must go [was: best way to write triples?] (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: What is RDF Datatyping? (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Missing support for datatype property idiom in datatyping MT? (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Before we go on... (Thursday, 18 April)
• best way to write triples? (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Missing support for datatype property idiom in datatyping MT? (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Pats URLs are back (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Dark triples, motivating examples (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Monday, 15 April)
• Re: pinging about rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics tests (Saturday, 6 April)
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft (Saturday, 6 April)
• Re: Range constraints on collection members (Saturday, 6 April)
• Re: daml:collection (Saturday, 6 April)
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers (Friday, 5 April)
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. (Friday, 5 April)
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. (Thursday, 4 April)
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases (Wednesday, 3 April)
• RE: RDF Datatyping Working Draft (Wednesday, 3 April)
• Re: [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases (Wednesday, 3 April)
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers (Wednesday, 3 April)
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers (Wednesday, 3 April)

Patrick Stickler

• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Monday, 29 April)
• The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world... (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: A test case (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Informal f2f in Honolulu? (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: The Cannes Entailment [was: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy] (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy (Monday, 29 April)
• Coming to grips with the entailment put forth by Jeremy (Friday, 26 April)
• Informal f2f in Honolulu? (Friday, 26 April)
• Regrets for next Friday's concall (Friday, 26 April)
• Clarifying the datatyping MT... (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: new issue: rdf-namespace-change (Friday, 26 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 23 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Saturday, 20 April)
• Re: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: A test case? [Re: Before we go on...] (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Before we go on... (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: What is RDF Datatyping? (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Missing support for datatype property idiom in datatyping MT? (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Before we go on... (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19 (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Thursday, 18 April)
• What is RDF Datatyping? (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: best way to write triples? (Thursday, 18 April)
• Before we go on... (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Missing support for datatype property idiom in datatyping MT? (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: best way to write triples? (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Missing support for datatype property idiom in datatyping MT? (Wednesday, 17 April)
• RDF Datatyping MT *does* define Datatyped Literal Pairings (Wednesday, 17 April)
• The point of RDF Datatyping (in case it wasn't clear ;-) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 16 April)
• 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: RDF datatyping, section 2.1 (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: RDF datatyping, section 2.1 (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: RDF Datatypes: proposal for abstract (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Suggestions for Use Cases materials (Saturday, 13 April)
• Re: Datatyping in Dublin Core (Saturday, 13 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Saturday, 13 April)
• Re: Datatype Draft Comments (Saturday, 13 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: SVG tools: [was Re: rdfs-constraining-containers, rdfs-container-membership-superProperty] (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (ship it!) (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Friday, 12 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (Thursday, 11 April)
• Latest iteration of RDF Datatyping WD (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Thursday, 11 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Wednesday, 10 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Re: Denotation of datatype values (Tuesday, 9 April)
• Denotation of datatype values (Monday, 8 April)
• Re: Proposal submissions (was: Re: Range constraints on collection members) (Sunday, 7 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping Working Draft (Saturday, 6 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping Working Draft (Saturday, 6 April)
• Range constraints on collection members (Friday, 5 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping Working Draft (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping Working Draft (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: RDF Datatyping Working Draft (Thursday, 4 April)
• RDF Datatyping Working Draft (Wednesday, 3 April)

R.V.Guha

• Re: daml:collection (Thursday, 4 April)

Raphael Volz

• Extension of RDF for inclusion/import in the language (Tuesday, 9 April)

Ronald Daniel

• RE: addressing requirements around daml:collection (rdfms-seq-rep resentation) (Monday, 22 April)
• RE: 2002-04-16 RDF Datatyping WD submitted for review by WG (Wednesday, 17 April)

Uche Ogbuji

• Re: New I-D: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration (Sunday, 7 April)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2002 19:17:13 UTC