Re: Charmod-Literal from Brian McBride on 2002-04-04 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from April 2002)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 10:59:43 +0100
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020404103205.00ac88a0@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>

At 19:34 03/04/2002 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>Last telecon the charmod literal issue (number 13) collapsed because DanC 
>didn't like the erratum process that was being proposed.
>
>I wanted to have another go basically aiming at a similar resolution, 
>using grey test-cases.
>
>I am using HTML/UTF-8 to try and prevent the funny characters getting munged.

I like the test cases approach Jeremy.  It greatly helps to clarify the issue.

The thing that struck me was whether these cases were expressing rulings 
about RDF/XML or about the graph syntax, e.g. is a literal beginning with a 
combining character black, white or grey in the graph syntax.

Brian

Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 06:16:21 UTC