- From: Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 16:38:58 +0200
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Brian McBride wrote:
>
> At 23:25 05/04/2002 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
>
> >I've created 6 test cases for this issue
> > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xmllang
> >
> >below
> > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/
> >
> >They test:
> >
> > test001/test002 xml:lang in-scope with a parseType="Literal"
> > test003/test004 xml:lang in-scope with an element content literal
> > test005/test006 xml:lang in-scope with an attribute content literal
> >
> >The pairs are for the cases without/with xml:lang in-scope.
>
> These all look good. Can someone else please volunteer to look them over.
>
> Brian
Dave,
I looked at them. They seem OK to me.
(The comment in test001.rdf and test002.rdf might be changed to
In-scope xml:lang applies to parseType=Literal element content
values
just to emphasize the point... but that's nit-picking)
--
Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>
Profium, Les Espaces de Sophia,
Immeuble Delta, B.P. 037, F-06901 Sophia-Antipolis, France
Tel. +33 (0)4.93.95.31.44 Fax. +33 (0)4.93.95.52.58
Mob. +33 (0)6.21.01.54.56 Internet: http://www.profium.com
Received on Monday, 8 April 2002 10:39:08 UTC