- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 07:04:19 -0400
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I'd like something clarified about this. First, isn't Test Cases normative? If it is, excluding N-triples creates a bit of a problem doesn't it? Second, isn't what's normative in RDF the graph in the mathematical sense? Both N-triples and the drawings are legitimate representations of (mathematical) graphs aren't they? Finally, it seems to me the WG has been fairly consistent in acting as if using N-triples actually clarified things. If that's true, they ought to be great in examples! --Frank Patrick Stickler wrote: > On 2002-04-18 22:38, "ext bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > > > >>11: How to represent triples in documents. >>Propose that triples should be represented using correct n-triples. >> >> >>See: >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0251.html >> > > I wouldn't want to see n-triples in the general examples. In the MT > section(s) they are more concise than XML, but I've been thinking that, > if n-triples are not normative, then we shouldn't have them in any > normative sections. > > Thus, we should use only RDF/XML and graphic representations in the > normative sections of all specifications. > > Patrick > > -- > > Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 > Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 > Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com > > > -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Friday, 19 April 2002 06:53:43 UTC