- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:12:23 -0700
- To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>[...] > >>>The Rule Fix >>>============ >>> >>>We build a rule mechanism, as in the know fix, into RDF. >> >>I think adding rules to RDF is a substantial change and out of >>scope. Especially this late in the WG cycle. > >Graham, this must be a misunderstanding >We have already 10 RDFS-entailment and RDFS closures rules in >http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-42402.html >and at least 3 draft ones for the RDFD-MT >that fix here is just maybe 2 extra proposed ones for the RDFD-MT Hold on, guys. The closure rules are only a technical device in the MT to relate different notions of entailment (in the latest draft, posted today, Ive tried to clarify that point a bit.) Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2002 13:12:23 UTC