- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:21:51 +0100
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Jan Grant said: > This is a fairly long message, and a call for volunteers. Topics covered: > outstanding tests that need approving; entailment tests; manifest files. > > > -- Outstanding tests that need approving. > > Basically, I could do with some spare pairs of eyes to check that > I've not missed anything - I've been back over the minutes a couple of > times, and failed to find resolutions that approve the following files; > some of these have no issue attached to them. > > If anyone _does_ find any of these, please let me know directly. > Otherwise, they need reviewing and approving or dropping. There may well > be some in here that were approved at the recent F2F that I've missed. > > entailment/* - Jos to describe using manifest format (see > below) > > rdfms-abouteach/error001.rdf > rdfms-abouteach/error002.rdf From 2002-04-05 telecon http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0112.html my action 2002-04-05#8 - add rdfms-abouteach to the names-test to make it illegal which somehow didn't make it to the minutes but is in the IRC log at http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2002-04-05#T15-21-09 announced in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0061.html closed in 2002-04-11 telcon http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0166.html > rdfms-rdf-names-use/error001.rdf > rdfms-rdf-names-use/error002.rdf > rdfms-rdf-names-use/error003.rdf > rdfms-rdf-names-use/test001.nt > rdfms-rdf-names-use/test001.rdf > rdfms-rdf-names-use/test002.nt > rdfms-rdf-names-use/test002.rdf > rdfms-rdf-names-use/test003.nt > rdfms-rdf-names-use/test003.rdf > rdfms-rdf-names-use/warn001.nt > rdfms-rdf-names-use/warn001.rdf > rdfms-rdf-names-use/warn002.nt > rdfms-rdf-names-use/warn002.rdf > rdfms-rdf-names-use/warn003.nt > rdfms-rdf-names-use/warn003.rdf From my action 2002-04-05#7 after approving the list of names in the rdf namespace in the syntax WD, needed them recorded in test cases. See the http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-rdf-names-use and the resolution which defines them. announced in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0043.html closed in 2002-04-11 telcon http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0166.html subject to me expanding them to 1 test per file. The perl script is written, I just need to run it to generate the 101 tests. Yes; there really will be 101 - testing all the names as node elements, property elements and property attributes. > rdfms-xmllang/test001.nt > rdfms-xmllang/test001.rdf > rdfms-xmllang/test002.nt > rdfms-xmllang/test002.rdf > rdfms-xmllang/test003.nt > rdfms-xmllang/test003.rdf > rdfms-xmllang/test004.nt > rdfms-xmllang/test004.rdf > rdfms-xmllang/test005.nt > rdfms-xmllang/test005.rdf > rdfms-xmllang/test006.nt > rdfms-xmllang/test006.rdf From my action 2002-04-05#6 after decisions in F2F announced in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0060.html closed in 2002-04-11 telcon http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0166.html > xmlbase/error001.rdf Aargh! This test case will not die. I want it to and we discussed it for weeks. Several WG members cannot agree on the right answer or even if there is a well defined one. Remains NOT approved. > rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test001.rdf > rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test002.rdf > rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test003.rdf > rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test004.rdf > rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test005.rdf There are no test answers to these. I proposed adding them and hearing no objections last week, will do so. > rdfms-parseType/error001.rdf > rdfms-parseType/error002.rdf > rdfms-parseType/error003.rdf Actually these do have non-error answers now; they are warnings and generate ntriples. I'll have a go at writing these too. <snip/> Dave
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 07:21:54 UTC