- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 14:55:40 +0200
- To: Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com
- Cc: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, patrick.stickler@nokia.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[...] >>The Rule Fix >>============ >> >>We build a rule mechanism, as in the know fix, into RDF. > >I think adding rules to RDF is a substantial change and out of >scope. Especially this late in the WG cycle. Graham, this must be a misunderstanding We have already 10 RDFS-entailment and RDFS closures rules in http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/w3-rdf-mt-draft-42402.html and at least 3 draft ones for the RDFD-MT that fix here is just maybe 2 extra proposed ones for the RDFD-MT -- Jos
Received on Monday, 29 April 2002 08:58:12 UTC