- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:49:33 +0100
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 11:09 AM 4/26/02 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote: >On 2002-04-25 15:56, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-namespace-change > > > > Summary: Some changes have been made to the RDF language (deletion of > > aboutEach*) and definition of terms (rdfs:domain, rdfs:range). This would > > normally call for a change of namespace URI's. If they are not changed, a > > strong case must be made. > > > > Brian > > >If it is in fact decided that the namespaces must change, I propose >that there be a single new namespace for all RDF, RDFS, RDFD terms. I have a lot of sympathy for this idea, and I can't offhand think of any disadvantages. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 06:10:05 UTC