- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:49:27 +0100
- To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
At 12:08 PM 4/28/02 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote: >1) Is there some reason why these Unicode characters cannot be %encoded? I >thought someone said something to this effect on the telecon, but I didn't >catch it. If not, what's the rationale for insisting on a >backwards-incompatible change, when the (comparatively) backwards-compatible >%encoding works just as well? The reason I heard was that the I18N group would like the user's original character input to be preserved as much as possible. If %-encoding is applied, it's not possible to tell if the user supplied it of the application. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Monday, 29 April 2002 07:00:44 UTC