- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:34:41 +0100 (BST)
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time: 10:00:00 Fri Apr 19 2002 in America/New York which is equivalent to 15:00:00 Fri Apr 19 2002 in Europe/London Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332 irc: irc.w3.org port 6665 #rdfcore 1: Allocate scribe 2: Roll Call 3: Introduce Observers 4: Review Agenda 5: Next telecon 10am Boston time, 26 Apr 2002 6: Review Minutes of 2002-04-12 See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0166.html 7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 2002-04-05#4 Brian sort out who will write text for updating test cases wd ACTION: 2002-04-12#5 aaron write up datatyping use-case for Dublin Core see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0168.html ACTION: 2002-04-12#7 jjc post message to rdfcore with motivating example for dark triples? see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0178.html 8: outstanding issues rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes rdfms-contexts rdfms-seq-representation rdf-charmod-uris rdfs-constraining-containers rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property rdfs-online-char-encoding rdfs-clarify-subClass-and-instance rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics rdfs-container-membership-superProperty rdfs-editorial faq-html-compliance See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/ 9: Review of CharMod last call #2 Can I have volunteers to review this document on behalf of the WG. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0270.html 10: Schedule and document status Primer 2002-02-25#17 EricM Ensure primer has appropriate description of use of rdf:value 2002-04-12#1 FrankM provide bwm with schedule for primer to last call Syntax 2002-02-15#7 DaveB Add sections to the syntax wd addressing the resolution of issue dfms-uri- substructure 2002-02-25#4 DaveB rdfms-nested-bagID: update syntax WD to reflect decision 2002-02-25#7 DaveB Emphasise in syntax WD that rdf:li is not allowed as an attribute 2002-02-25#8 DaveB Update syntax doc to reflect decision that rdf:foo should generate warning 2002-02-25#10 DaveB Update syntax doc to reflect xml:base same doc ref decision 2002-02-25#13 DaveB Update syntax WD to reflect xml:base="http://example.org"> decision 2002-02-26#3 DaveB Update syntax doc to reflect decsision about structure of literals 2002-04-05#13 DaveB to add comment to syntax working draft that literals begininng with a combining character may cause interop problems... see charmod Model Theory Schema 2002-04-12#3 danbri produce schedule for schema to last call, by 19 Apr 2002 Test cases 2002-02-15#10 JanG Add test cases for the reification entailment decisions #1 and #2 to the test suite 2002-02-25#2 JanG Add test case for <eg:prop rdf:ID="issue" eg:p1="foo" /> to test cases draft 2002-02-25#3 JanG Review test cases in case changed by &eg:prop rdf:ID="issue" eg:p1="foo" /> decision 2002-02-25#9 JanG Ensure test cases for rdf:foo added to test cases WD 2002-02-25#11 JanG Add test case for xml:base same doc reference to test cases WD 2002-02-25#14 JanG update test cases to reflect xml:base="http://example.org"> decision 2002-02-26#7 DaveB Update test cases to reflect not-id-and- resource decision 2002-03-15#3 JanG update test cases to reflect approval of xml:base test cases 2002-03-15#5 JanG update test cases to reflect approval of rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr 2002-03-15#6 JanG update test cases to reflect approval of rdfms-nested-bagID 2002-04-05#7 DaveB expand rdfms-rdf-names-use test cases F2F in June: we won't be able to use it for last call comments. Does the WG believe it would be good to meet, given the opportunity. See: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/#L473 11: How to represent triples in documents. Propose that triples should be represented using correct n-triples. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0251.html 12: Datatyping WD Is this document ready for first publication? Are the editors agreed? See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0215.html 13: Issue: rdfs-online-char-encoding Propose: o action Eric to update the schema file with the appropriate character encoding declaration o close this issue See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-online-char-encoding 14: Issue: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty Propose: o the WG resolves to define rdfs:contains, a common superproperty of the containermembership properties. o actions Danbri to add this definition to RDF schema. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-container-membership-superProperty 15: Issue: rdfs-constraining-containers Is it possible to constrain the members of a container to be of a given type? Propose: o the WG resolves that expressing such a constraint is beyond the scope of RDFS. Such functionality belongs with more powerful ontology languages such as daml+oil and owl. o The WG notes that DAML+OIL can express this constraint as described in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0106.html o The WG closes this issue See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-constraining-containers http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0106.html 16: Issue: rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property Summary: Can an instance of the Property class have a subClassOf property? What does this mean? Propose the WG resolves: o an instance of the Property class may have an rdfs:subClassOf property o the meaning of such a property is defined by the model theory o this issue be closed See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property 17: daml:collection See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-seq-representation 18: Issue: rdf-charmod-resources See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-charmod-uris 19: Suggest after hours discussion of dark triples ------------------------------------------------------------ This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 16:34:44 UTC