Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-04-19

Time:
10:00:00 Fri Apr 19 2002 in America/New York

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Apr 19 2002 in Europe/London

Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org port 6665 #rdfcore

1: Allocate scribe


2: Roll Call


3: Introduce Observers


4: Review Agenda


5: Next telecon 10am Boston time, 26 Apr 2002


6: Review Minutes of 2002-04-12 

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0166.html


7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions

ACTION: 2002-04-05#4 Brian
sort out who will write text for updating test cases wd

ACTION: 2002-04-12#5 aaron
write up datatyping use-case for Dublin Core

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0168.html

ACTION: 2002-04-12#7 jjc
post message to rdfcore with motivating example for dark triples?

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0178.html



8: outstanding issues

rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes
rdfms-contexts
rdfms-seq-representation
rdf-charmod-uris
rdfs-constraining-containers
rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property
rdfs-online-char-encoding
rdfs-clarify-subClass-and-instance
rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics
rdfs-container-membership-superProperty
rdfs-editorial
faq-html-compliance



See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/


9: Review of CharMod last call #2
Can I have volunteers to review this document on behalf of the WG.


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0270.html


10: Schedule and document status

Primer
2002-02-25#17 EricM Ensure primer has appropriate description of use of rdf:value
2002-04-12#1 FrankM provide bwm with schedule for primer to last call

Syntax
2002-02-15#7 DaveB Add sections to the syntax wd addressing the resolution of issue dfms-uri- substructure
2002-02-25#4 DaveB rdfms-nested-bagID: update syntax WD to reflect decision
2002-02-25#7 DaveB Emphasise in syntax WD that rdf:li is not allowed as an attribute
2002-02-25#8 DaveB Update syntax doc to reflect decision that rdf:foo should generate warning
2002-02-25#10 DaveB Update syntax doc to reflect xml:base same doc ref decision
2002-02-25#13 DaveB Update syntax WD to reflect xml:base="http://example.org"> decision
2002-02-26#3 DaveB Update syntax doc to reflect decsision about structure of literals
2002-04-05#13 DaveB to add comment to syntax working draft that literals begininng with a combining character may cause interop problems... see charmod

Model Theory

Schema
2002-04-12#3 danbri produce schedule for schema to last call, by 19 Apr 2002

Test cases
2002-02-15#10 JanG Add test cases for the reification entailment decisions #1 and #2 to the test suite
2002-02-25#2 JanG Add test case for <eg:prop rdf:ID="issue" eg:p1="foo" /> to test cases draft
2002-02-25#3 JanG Review test cases in case changed by &eg:prop rdf:ID="issue" eg:p1="foo" /> decision
2002-02-25#9 JanG Ensure test cases for rdf:foo added to test cases WD
2002-02-25#11 JanG Add test case for xml:base same doc reference to test cases WD
2002-02-25#14 JanG update test cases to reflect xml:base="http://example.org"> decision
2002-02-26#7 DaveB Update test cases to reflect not-id-and- resource decision
2002-03-15#3 JanG update test cases to reflect approval of xml:base test cases
2002-03-15#5 JanG update test cases to reflect approval of rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
2002-03-15#6 JanG update test cases to reflect approval of rdfms-nested-bagID
2002-04-05#7 DaveB expand rdfms-rdf-names-use test cases

F2F in June: we won't be able to use it for last call comments.  Does the WG believe it would be good to meet, given the opportunity.


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/#L473


11: How to represent triples in documents.
Propose that triples should be represented using correct n-triples.


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0251.html


12: Datatyping WD
Is this document ready for first publication?  Are the editors agreed?


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0215.html


13: Issue: rdfs-online-char-encoding
Propose:

  o action Eric to update the schema file with the appropriate character encoding declaration

 o close this issue


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-online-char-encoding


14: Issue: rdfs-container-membership-superProperty 
Propose:

  o the WG resolves to define rdfs:contains, a common superproperty 
    of the containermembership properties.

  o actions Danbri to add this definition to RDF schema. 


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-container-membership-superProperty


15: Issue: rdfs-constraining-containers

Is it possible to constrain the members of a container to be of a given type?
 
Propose:

  o the WG resolves that expressing such a constraint is beyond the 
    scope of RDFS.  Such functionality belongs with more powerful 
    ontology languages such as daml+oil and owl.

  o The WG notes that DAML+OIL can express this constraint as described in:

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0106.html

  o The WG closes this issue


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-constraining-containers
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0106.html


16: Issue: rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property
Summary: Can an instance of the Property class have a subClassOf 
property? What does this mean?
 
Propose the WG resolves:

  o an instance of the Property class may have an rdfs:subClassOf
    property

  o the meaning of such a property is defined by the model theory

  o this issue be closed


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property


17: daml:collection

See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-seq-representation


18: Issue: rdf-charmod-resources

See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-charmod-uris


19: Suggest after hours discussion of dark triples



------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant

Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 16:34:44 UTC