- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:46:14 +0300
- To: ext Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>, "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-04-19 14:02, "ext Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com> wrote: > > >> Observing, and to some extent fearing, the nature of the recent datatypes >> discussion, I was wondering if we could bring some more structure to it > by >> asking for a test case. Then I saw this message from Jos and thought > this >> might be the basis of a test case we could decide on. Is it? Is there > an >> entailment test here? > > well we have (an already aging) one > > does the merge of the graphs > http://www.agfa.com/w3c/n3/p7.nt > http://www.agfa.com/w3c/n3/p7s.nt > RDF-RDFS-RDFD-entail > http://www.agfa.com/w3c/n3/p8.nt > > ??? Uggg, please not these USDate vs. UKDate examples again. Let's try to use something else -- and in particular, something which relates the different idioms, which is what I consider to be the main issue now. I.e., something like the example I just sent out... Patrick > -- > Jos > >> Brian >> >> ps: Someone (Jos?) has a badly formed email address configured for > Patrick >> - my email server barfs when I try to reply. >> >> "Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> >> >> should be >> >> "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> >> >> Oh and similarly for PatH and RDFCore for that matter. >> >> B > > I think it's indeed our Lotus Notes :-( > > PS after some back and forth process with Jan, we have the Manifest files > in > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/ > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/statement-entailment/ > now up and running > > > -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 19 April 2002 07:45:57 UTC