- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:46:14 +0300
- To: ext Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>, "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-04-19 14:02, "ext Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Observing, and to some extent fearing, the nature of the recent datatypes
>> discussion, I was wondering if we could bring some more structure to it
> by
>> asking for a test case. Then I saw this message from Jos and thought
> this
>> might be the basis of a test case we could decide on. Is it? Is there
> an
>> entailment test here?
>
> well we have (an already aging) one
>
> does the merge of the graphs
> http://www.agfa.com/w3c/n3/p7.nt
> http://www.agfa.com/w3c/n3/p7s.nt
> RDF-RDFS-RDFD-entail
> http://www.agfa.com/w3c/n3/p8.nt
>
> ???
Uggg, please not these USDate vs. UKDate examples again.
Let's try to use something else -- and in particular, something
which relates the different idioms, which is what I consider to
be the main issue now.
I.e., something like the example I just sent out...
Patrick
> --
> Jos
>
>> Brian
>>
>> ps: Someone (Jos?) has a badly formed email address configured for
> Patrick
>> - my email server barfs when I try to reply.
>>
>> "Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
>>
>> should be
>>
>> "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
>>
>> Oh and similarly for PatH and RDFCore for that matter.
>>
>> B
>
> I think it's indeed our Lotus Notes :-(
>
> PS after some back and forth process with Jan, we have the Manifest files
> in
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/statement-entailment/
> now up and running
>
>
>
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 19 April 2002 07:45:57 UTC