Re: notation for literals

>At 11:39 25/04/2002 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
>[...] excellent summary snipped
>
>>but as Pat said, the MT can consider literals opaque once the
>>equality rules are clear.
>
>
>I was thinking equality rules should be in the mt.

Well, I could write a paragraph trying to capture Dave's summary and 
insert it into the section on graph syntax. It would be a bit of a 
detour, but that entire section is already a kind of meander in any 
case.  I guess I assumed that this would fit more naturally in the 
syntax document somewhere.

Brian, your call.

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 10:26:28 UTC