- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:20:08 +0100 (BST)
- To: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- cc: "RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Jos De_Roo wrote: > > > > - entailment tests and manifest files. > > Jos, in the directory > > > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/ > > > > there is another Manifest.rdf that describes both parser and entailment > > tests for your conjunctive range/domain issue. > > > > Hopefully this provides sufficient examples to describe your other > > entailment work; I'm writing words for all of this RSN. > > [wondering what RSN might mean...] > > you've made up a good test vocabulary Jan !! > I'm trying to adapt our running code for that > and for the moment it uses NT/N3 documents, so > I have to do conversions using ARP and/or CWM > > for the .../rdfs-domain-and-range/Manifest.rdf > I get some errors like > > [[[ > http://jena.hpl.hp.com/arp/not/a/real/uri/[20:125]: {E201} Syntax > error when processing attribute rdf:resource. > Cannot have attribute rdf:resource in this context. > ]]] > > so I've (*) added a couple of rdf:parseType="Resource" attributes > (as well as test:NT-Document elements for the PositiveEntailmentTest) > and that worked for ARP as well as for with CWM Doh! - late at night. Those should be rdf:about. Fixing now. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk Don't annihilate, assimilate: MacDonalds, not missiles.
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 05:21:02 UTC