W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: towards closure of issue: rdf-namespace-change

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 26 Apr 2002 10:41:54 -0500
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1019835714.17366.336.camel@dirk>
On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 10:24, Dan Brickley wrote:
> I propose we close rdf-namespace-issue as follows.
> Is this enough to close the issue

I don't think so; I don't think it makes the case for why
we should be able to keep the old namespace name even though
we're changing the language.

It suggests that there is a case to be made, but it
doesn't make the case.

I'd like to help write it, but I'm not in a good position just now.

>   (@@ also ptr to charter which has nice words on this tension)

perhaps pasting those words in is a step forward.

> - that the final RDF Core RECommendations will set clearer expectations
>   about the impact of subsequent revisions to RDF on the use of these
>   namespaces.

That's another promise that I'd like fullfilled before we close
the issue.

> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
> [2] http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 11:41:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:12 UTC