- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 26 Apr 2002 10:41:54 -0500
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 10:24, Dan Brickley wrote: > > I propose we close rdf-namespace-issue as follows. > > Is this enough to close the issue I don't think so; I don't think it makes the case for why we should be able to keep the old namespace name even though we're changing the language. It suggests that there is a case to be made, but it doesn't make the case. I'd like to help write it, but I'm not in a good position just now. > (@@ also ptr to charter which has nice words on this tension) perhaps pasting those words in is a step forward. > - that the final RDF Core RECommendations will set clearer expectations > about the impact of subsequent revisions to RDF on the use of these > namespaces. That's another promise that I'd like fullfilled before we close the issue. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# > [2] http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 11:41:40 UTC