- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 18:02:55 +0100
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
This is a list of the outstanding issues as I currently have them in the
issues list. There is one more to add, the need for a superproperty of the
container membership properties.
Model and Syntax Issues
* rdfms-contexts: Suggestion that the concept of context is missing
from RDF.
* rdfms-seq-representation: The ordinal property representation of
containers does not support recursive processing of containers in languages
such as Prolog.
* rdfms-assertion: RDF is not just a data model; an RDF statement is
an assertion.
* mime-types-for-rdf-docs: What mime type should RDF Schema and other
RDF documents have?
* rdf-charmod-literals: Does the treatment of literals conform to
charmod ?
* rdf-charmod-uris: Does the treatment of uris conform to charmod ?
RDF Schema Issues
* rdfs-constraining-containers: Should it be possible to constrain the
members of a container to be of a given type?
* rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property: Clarify whether a Property can have a
subClassOf property, and if so, what that would mean?
* rdfs-online-char-encoding: There is problem with the character
encoding of the online RDF Schema.
* rdfs-clarify-subClass-and-instance: Suggestion of clearer discussion
of use of subClass and instance relationships simultaneously.
* rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics: Must the value of an rdfs:isDefinedBy
property be a schema?
* rdfs-editorial: General editorial comments.
RDF FAQ Issues
* faq-html-compliance: The suggested way of including RDF meta data in
HTML is not compliant with HTML 4.01 or XHTML
Brian
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 12:05:38 UTC