- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:48:36 +0100
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020426204513.00abce40@joy.songbird.com>
RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-04-26 10:00:00 Fri Apr 26 2002 in America/New York 15:00:00 Fri Apr 26 2002 in Europe/London Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332 irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore Transcript: (file 2002-04-26-irc.txt attached) Actions summary: (file 2002-04-26-actions.txt attached -- please review, some may be my invention!) Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0430.html 1: Allocate scribe: Graham Klyne 2: Roll call Participants: - Aaron Swartz - Brian McBride (chair) - Daniel Brickley - Dave Beckett - Eric Miller (co-chair) - Frank Manola - Graham Klyne - Jeremey Carroll - Jos De Roo - Patrick Stickler - Ron Daniels - Jan Grant - Sergey Melnik - Martyn Horner - Dan Connolly - Pat Hayes - Mike Dean Regrets/Absent: - Stephen Petschulat - Bill dehOra - Frank Boumphrey - Guha - KWON Hyung-Jin - Michael Kopchenov - Ora Lassila - Pierre G Richard - Rael Dornfest - Satoshi Nakamura - Yoshiyuki Kitahara 3: Introduce Observers 4: Review Agenda Jeremy requests charmod review before testcases (15/13) 5: Next telecon 10am Boston time, 03 May 2002 This is very close to WWW2002 -- may be scratched, but stands for now. 6: Review Minutes of 2002-04-19 See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0406.html APPROVED 7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 2001-08-02#9 2001-08-02#25 2001-08-02#26 2001-08-02#27 2001-08-02#28 2001-08-02#29 2001-08-02#30 2001-08-02#31 2001-08-02#32 2001-08-02#32 2001-08-02#17 2001-08-02#19 Dan Brickley Fold agreed changes into RDF Schema WD see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0349.html ACTION: 2002-02-08#4 PatH write up container proposal for common superproperty and put to the group for approval. ACTION: 2002-02-15#7 DaveB Add sections to the syntax wd addressing the resolution of issue dfms-uri-substructure ACTION: 2002-02-15#10 JanG Add test cases for the reification entailment decisions #1 and #2 to the test suite see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0476.html see: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/statement-entailment/ ACTION: 2002-02-25#4 DaveB rdfms-nested-bagID: update syntax WD to reflect decision ACTION: 2002-02-25#7 DaveB Emphasise in syntax WD that rdf:li is not allowed as an attribute ACTION: 2002-02-25#8 DaveB Update syntax doc to reflect decision that rdf:foo should generate warning ACTION: 2002-02-25#10 DaveB Update syntax doc to reflect xml:base same doc ref decision ACTION: 2002-02-25#13 DaveB Update syntax WD to reflect xml:base="http://example.org"> decision ACTION: 2002-02-26#3 DaveB Update syntax doc to reflect decsision about structure of literals ACTION: 2002-02-26#7 DaveB Update test cases to reflect not-id-and-resource decision ACTION: 2002-03-15#3 JanG update test cases to reflect approval of xml:base test cases see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0235.html ACTION: 2002-03-15#5 JanG update test cases to reflect approval of rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0235.html ACTION: 2002-03-15#6 JanG update test cases to reflect approval of rdfms-nested-bagID see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0235.html ACTION: 2002-04-05#7 DaveB expand rdfms-rdf-names-use test cases ACTION: 2002-04-05#13 DaveB to add comment to syntax working draft that literals begininng with a combining character may cause interop problems... see charmod ACTION: 2002-04-19#6 aaron review schema see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0357.html ACTION: 2002-04-19#9 danbri make schema draft available monday see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0349.html ACTION: 2002-04-19#10 janG have test cases WD to review for Monday see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0347.html ACTION: 2002-04-19#15 danbri propose name for containerMembershipProperties superproerpty see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0349.html ACTION: 2002-04-19#19 brian accept chance to review charmod see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2002AprJun/0030.html ALL CONFIRMED 8: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions ACTION: 2002-04-12#3 danbri produce schedule for schema to last call, by 19 Apr 2002 ALL CONFIRMED 9: outstanding issues - 9 left rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes rdfms-contexts rdfms-seq-representation rdf-charmod-uris rdfs-clarify-subClass-and-instance rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics rdfs-editorial rdf-namespace-change faq-html-compliance See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/ ACTION 2002-04-26#1, Aaron: prepare proposal for rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-isDefinedBy-semantics ACTION 2002-04-26#2, Aaron: prepare proposal for rdfs-clarify-subClass-and-instance http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-clarify-subClass-and-instance ?? ACTION 2002-04-26#3, DanBri: prepare response/proposal for rdfs-editorial ?? ACTION 2002-04-26#4, DanBri: Make proposal to close rdf-namespace-change 10: New publication rules Some changes to the publication rules are now being implemented. Eric has accepted action to create disclosures page. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0401.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0420.html Eric notes that everybody should be aware of these changes, particularly the IPR disclosure requirements. Publishing deadline before WWW2002 is April 30. ACTION 2002-04-26#5, Eric: get IPR statements link in place by April 30 11: Document status Model Theory: PatH is running a little behind schedule Important changes: simplification of literals, expunged weasle wording about (un)asserted triples, some discussion of containers - not complete. ACTION 2002-04-26#6, PatH: If possible, submit new MT document to Eric for publication by 29 April, AM. Datatypes: bwm: need to take care that datatype spec and model theory don't say different things; some issues to be resolved between PatrickS and PatH about what the MT actually says No resolutions here. 12: Primer Frank: message sent out last night - new version 20020424 has all of material from reviewed version PLUS new section on PRISM plus editorial changes. See: http://www.w3.org/2001/09/rdfprimer/rdf-primer-20020418fm.html Does not deal with use of rdf:value. Eric and Frank believe it's ready to publish. DanBri: hasn't reviewed schema section yet; would like warning on that ... or blanket warning about possible mis-sync between documents. PROPOSED: publish primer APPROVED ACTION 2002-04-26#7, Eric: Take primer as-is, and publish 13: Test Cases WD (see item 15, taken out of order) 2002-02-25#2 JanG Add test case for <eg:prop rdf:ID="issue" eg:p1="foo" /> to test cases draft 2002-02-25#3 JanG Review test cases in case changed by &eg:prop rdf:ID="issue" eg:p1="foo" /> decision 2002-02-25#9 JanG Ensure test cases for rdf:foo added to test cases WD 2002-02-25#11 JanG Add test case for xml:base same doc reference to test cases WD 2002-02-25#14 JanG update test cases to reflect xml:base="http://example.org"> decision See: http://www.w3.org/2001/08/rdf-test/ JanG: Several actions done, some awaiting checkin. Apart from test cases to-be-approved, content is pretty much final. DanC wants directions to implementers to tell them how to collect and submit test results. Response: mail them to rdf-comments. DaveB: in light of decisions on charmod [item 15] we need to change N-triples Also agreed to remove reference to IRI document. PROPOSED: Test cases WD should be approved for publication. APPROVED (DaveB will provide some text for changes required, JanG will have editorial discretion to get the document ready for publication. ACTION 2002-04-26#7, DaveB: provide revised test for test cases draft ACTION 2002-04-26#8, JanG: prepare test cases draft for publication, with editorial discretion ACTION 2002-04-26#9, EricM: publish test cases draft as revised 14: Schema WD Review comments. Are we ready to publish? See: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/Schema/200203/ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/Schema/200203/rdfs-namespace.xml DanBri: Current document not polished PROPOSED DanBri to publish, with editorial discretion to knock into better shape over the next couple of days APPROVED ACTION 2002-04-26#10, DanBri: publish schema WD ACTION 2002-04-26#11, bwm: per DanBri request, add issue of serialization to next meeting agenda 15: Issue: rdf-charmod-resources Propose approve test cases in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0116.html and close this issue. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-charmod-uris http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0116.html Discussion about whether URI should be %-escaped to US-ASCII, of left as Unicode in Normal Form C (NFC). No overwhelming opinion, but in absence of adequate guidance from I18N and other standards, we need to make a decision. PROPOSED: Leave URI reference as un-escaped Unicode (alternative is to convert to %-escaped US-ASCII) Opposed: bwm, aaronsw, josd Abstain: frankm All others agree or concur Some test cases (Item 13) resolved in light of this decision... 16: Test Cases Are we able to approve: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/statement-entailment/ http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-rdf-names-use/ See: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/statement-entailment/ http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-rdf-names-use/ (Item skipped) 17: defining literal equality See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0410.html (Item skipped) 18: daml:collection Dan has started a discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0334.html See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-seq-representation http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0334.html (Item skipped) --end--
Attachments
- text/plain attachment: 2002-04-26-actions.txt
- text/plain attachment: 2002-04-26-irc.txt
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 15:40:53 UTC