- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:03:54 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 16:33 15/04/2002 -0400, Pat Hayes wrote: [...] >I don't want to be a party-pooper, but I honestly feel that having an MT >and sticking to it is one way to get past this kind of half-formalized >(and rather confusing) kind of discussion. I do not know what these >'levels' are supposed to be, or how to recognize them, or how to evaluate >talk about them, etc. etc. . Why not stick to the syntax and the MT, and >just talk about that? Then everything is clear. What an application wants >to do with an RDF graph is up to it, not up to us. All we can do is to >provide application writers with a gold standard for meanings, and leave >other 'layers' to them. I agree. Brian
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 13:06:18 UTC