- From: Ronald Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:52:44 -0700
- To: "'Dave Beckett'" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, Lynn Andrea Stein <las@olin.edu>
Dave Beckett said: > >>>Dan Connolly said: > > (does anybody in the WG know of anybody in > > the general RDF implementation community > > who hasn't already added support for daml:collection?) > > ... > > Anyone who has implemented RDF M&S and no more will likely fail on > daml:collection. That includes PRISM, Dublin Core, Mozilla and so > on. To be more specific - PRISM does not use daml:collection. People writing PRISM code might do so on top of a parser that understood daml:collection. But for those of us still using older parsers like Megginson's RDFFilter, our code will throw a syntax error since daml:collection is an unknown parse type. I've been meaning to move to a more up-to-date RDF parser. If I get the chance to look into this more I'll let you know although if someone wanted to use it in the middle of a PRISM description > I feel like we should be very cautious adding changes late in the > (WG) day to RDF 1.0. The changes we made have been out in the > RDF community for a while (namespace prefixes, aboutEach*). Massive agreement. Ron
Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 18:53:20 UTC