- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:10:52 +0200
- To: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
- Cc: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> > > [...] > > > If y'all want it to actually be the set of literals, then we would need > > > to re-think this whole issue. > > > > Is there a problem here? I just heard Pat say no. > > I thought he asked a question. I didn't hear a 'no'. I'm perfectly happy with rdfs:Literal being the class whose members *denote* literals (quoted character strings which denote themselves and which are member of LV) -- Jos
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2002 04:40:10 UTC