- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 17:04:21 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Aside -- I think we agreed s/rdfs:contains/rdfs:member/ to sync with M+S recommended property naming pattern dan On 25 Apr 2002, Dan Connolly wrote: > Jan, Jos, > > I'm supposed to do a (negative) entailment > test that shows rdfs:contains does *not* > entail rdf:_1. > > I got as far as putting the premise and > the (non-)conclusion in > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-container-membership-superProperty/not1P.n3 > and > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-container-membership-superProperty/not1C.n3 > > but I'm not sure what else to do. Er.. > I guess I can convert them to RDF/xml... > ok; done. > > But I'm not sure what to do with > all this <test:premiseDocument> stuff; is that something > you guys would please do for me? > > http://www.w3.org/2001/08/rdf-test/ > > > >
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 17:04:24 UTC