- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 09:37:19 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 05:14 PM 4/18/02 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote: >Right, I take your point and agree. On the other hand there is a link to >rdfs:range in that the datatyping constraints are applied to the object of >the property rather than the subject, so the 'pointed end' association is >similar to rdfs:range (instead of rdfs:domain). Its not a very logical >connection, but I bet users will find it a useful association. That is why >I rather liked the 'drange' or 'dcrange' idioms, which had a kind of >range-ish flavor but didnt actually say 'range'. > >How about rdfd:dtype ?? I really just want it to be more visually >distinct from the class name: it's too easy to make typos at present. rdfd:Datatype and rdfd:dlexRange or rdfd:dlexType or rdfd:dlexFormat ? #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 19 April 2002 04:56:31 UTC