- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:21:51 +0100
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 11:23 AM 4/26/02 +0100, Jan Grant wrote: >Dan asked me to send this on-list. Mostly niggles. I agree with most what you say. Likening RDF classes to OO classes has, in my view, caused more confusion than clarification. >I'd also (I know it's late in the game) be inclined to float the >suggestion of "fixing" the rdfs:subClassOf & co. properties, deprecating >these in favour of names that are the right way around according to M+S, >and including entailment rules to show that they're the same thing. >(just make them circularly subproperties of their renamed versions) >- particularly if we're switching namespace. I'd be inclined to defer this to RDF 2 (unless there is a decision to change namespaces now). #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Monday, 29 April 2002 07:00:45 UTC