- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 20:26:17 +0100
- To: "Massimo Marchiori" <massimo@w3.org>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Hi Massimo, The WG has had an extensive discussion of blank nodes. It was hard work getting to a decision. The decision however, is made, and has been for some time. If you have identified a specific technical objection to the decision, I'd be grateful if you would notify us on www-rdf-comments@w3.org, as indicated by the model theory document. As to the charter question you raise, I disagree. The job of this WG is to clarify M&S; this was a question that was evidently unclear as people read M&S different ways, and the WG has clarified it. The model theory draft is as much a proposal as any other rec track WD that has been through a couple of revisions, has the support of the WG and is considered to be close to last call. Now we are kinda busy right now, so its not a good time to go reopening old issues. This one has been done to death. Brian
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 14:28:34 UTC