- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 22 Apr 2002 11:24:24 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, Lynn Andrea Stein <las@olin.edu>
On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 11:28, Graham Klyne wrote: > The question I'm asking myself is: how does this pan out for RDF systems > that treat parseType='collection' as parseType='literal'? Poorly, as noted: > >- parse-collection-STD raises the bar for the general > > RDF implementation community, who has been told > > that we're just working out bugs, and is not > > expecting us to demand more features of them. > > > > (does anybody in the WG know of anybody in > > the general RDF implementation community > > who hasn't already added support for daml:collection?) -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 12:24:24 UTC