- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:24:40 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I propose we close rdf-namespace-issue as follows. Is this enough to close the issue or does someone need to write the text for the specs? Anyway, this should be enough for discussion at a telecon. The RDF Core WG resolves... - that it does NOT intend to create new namespace URI references to name the RDF Schema namespace[1] and the RDF model/syntax namespace[2]. - that we solicit feedback during Last Call from implementors and content producers on this decision, acknowledging that while there have been changes to the specs associated with [1] and [2], there are also significant costs associated with moving RDF to use new URIs. (@@ also ptr to charter which has nice words on this tension) - that we do not know at this stage whether the RDF Core specs will change further as a result of Last Call feedback, and consequently make for a more compelling case for namespace change. - that the final RDF Core RECommendations will set clearer expectations about the impact of subsequent revisions to RDF on the use of these namespaces. [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# [2] http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 11:24:39 UTC