public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from October to December 2009 by author

Alexandre Passant

• Re: Review of Service Description document (Sunday, 27 December)
• Review of Service Description document (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: [TF-PP] Minor comments on the current document (Tuesday, 24 November)
• [TF-PP] Minor comments on the current document (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: SD vocab updates: dataset descriptions (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: F2F3 (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: Some comments on the SPARQL 1.1 draft documents (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Rough minutes from last week's meeting (2009-10-27) (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-10-27 - 10:00 Eastern = *14:00* UK time !!! (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: Update review (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Protocol changes (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: updated service description document (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: updated service description document (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday, October 13, 2009 (Tuesday, 13 October)

Andreas Langegger

• Re: Protocol extensions for federated querying (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Protocol extensions for federated querying (Wednesday, 21 October)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: styling summary (Wednesday, 30 December)
• Re: styling summary (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: ACTION summary (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: Update short forms (from ISSUE-24) (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: rq25 aggregate functions (Thursday, 24 December)
• Update short forms (from ISSUE-24) (Wednesday, 23 December)
• ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs (Wednesday, 23 December)
• Re: Update on Update (Wednesday, 23 December)
• Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: "Proposed W3C Typographic Conventions" (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: Comment on: rq25 (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: ACTION summary (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: SPARQL WG - 2009-12-22 Agenda (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Review of "SPARQL 1.1 Update" (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: ACTION summary (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: rq25 aggregate functions (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: rq25 aggregate functions (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: rq25 aggregate functions (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: rq25 aggregate functions (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: rq25 aggregate functions (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: Comment on: rq25 (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: Comment on: rq25 (Monday, 21 December)
• rq25 select expressions and negation (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: Update on Update (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: Team action request (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Team action request (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Draft response to LD-2 (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Response (Monday, 14 December)
• SELECT expressions content (Monday, 14 December)
• XML doc format (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: important issues on rdf-update to put on the TC before christmas? (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: important issues on rdf-update to put on the TC before christmas? (Sunday, 13 December)
• Inner CONSTRUCT (Was Drafting definitions for select expressions) (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Drafting definitions for select expressions (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Drafting definitions for select expressions (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: agenda for tomorrow... (Monday, 7 December)
• SPARQL Query 1.0 Errata processing (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Example updates (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Example updates (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Example updates (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Updates (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Draft response to Rob Vesse (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Updates (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Updates (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2009-12-01 Agenda (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Syntax translation between SELECT expressions and LET assignment (Sunday, 29 November)
• Drafting definitions for select expressions (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: [TF-PP] Document now in CVS (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2009/11/24 Agenda (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: [TF-PP] Document now in CVS (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: RDF datasets for SPARQL Update? (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: RDF datasets for SPARQL Update? (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: SD vocab updates: dataset descriptions (Sunday, 22 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Sunday, 22 November)
• Re: "Unbound" in SPARQL (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: "Unbound" in SPARQL (was Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: "Unbound" in SPARQL (was Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: "Unbound" in SPARQL (was Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• CommentResponse:ldodds-query-1 ready for review (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: "Unbound" in SPARQL (was Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: "Unbound" in SPARQL (was Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name) (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: scope of alias variables (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Sunday, 15 November)
• Re: Semantics of SUM (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: HAVING vs. FILTER (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: Semantics of SUM (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: DISTINCT with aggregates (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: scope of alias variables (Friday, 13 November)
• [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: scope of alias variables (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: HAVING vs. FILTER (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: Semantics of SUM (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: DISTINCT with aggregates (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: Semantics of SUM (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Potential design space of LET/assignment (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Potential design space of LET/assignment (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Semantics of SUM (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Semantics of SUM (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Draft response for " Inferencing on graph patterns" comment of Simon Reinhardt (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Views on the outcomes of F2F (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Draft response for " Inferencing on graph patterns" comment of Simon Reinhardt (Tuesday, 10 November)
• HTTP Update : graph naming (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Draft response for " Inferencing on graph patterns" comment of Simon Reinhardt (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Sunday, 8 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Sunday, 8 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Sunday, 8 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Saturday, 7 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Friday, 6 November)
• [TF-PP] Document now in CVS (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Draft Response for "Comments on SPARQL 1.1 WD 20091022" (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Friday, 6 November)
• Draft Response for "Comments on SPARQL 1.1 WD 20091022" (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: example query on aggregates in SPARQL/Query Section 2 (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: [pedantic-web] ERRATA in examples for Query (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: Introduction: Andy Seaborne (Monday, 2 November)

Axel Polleres

• Re: ACTION summary (Thursday, 24 December)
• minutes from today... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-12-22 (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: SPARQL WG - 2009-12-22 Agenda (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: ACTION summary (Tuesday, 22 December)
• ACTION summary (Tuesday, 22 December)
• ACTION-145 --> ISSUE-25 (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: SPARQL WG - 2009-12-22 Agenda (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD (Tuesday, 22 December)
• SPARQL WG - 2009-12-22 Agenda (Friday, 18 December)
• important issues on rdf-update to put on the TC before christmas? (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Drafting definitions for select expressions (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Drafting definitions for select expressions (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Drafting definitions for select expressions (Tuesday, 8 December)
• ACTION-140:Track all mails on comments list on wiki - done (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: agenda for tomorrow... (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: agenda for tomorrow... now here's the agenda. (Monday, 7 December)
• agenda for tomorrow... (Monday, 7 December)
• ACTION-133 (Monday, 7 December)
• SPARQL TC 2009-12-01 Agenda (Monday, 30 November)
• SPARQL TC 2009/11/24 Agenda (Monday, 23 November)
• Fwd: RDB2RDF Working Group (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: HAVING vs. FILTER (was: Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F) (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: More on the evil examples... and "What really happened to Limit per Resource?" (Monday, 9 November)
• More on the evil examples... and "What really happened to Limit per Resource?" (Friday, 6 November)
• Fwd: Some comments on the SPARQL 1.1 draft documents (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: example query on aggregates in SPARQL/Query Section 2 (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Friday, 6 November)
• example query on subselect in SPARQL/Query Section 3 (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: example query on aggregates in SPARQL/Query Section 2 (Thursday, 5 November)
• example query on aggregates in SPARQL/Query Section 2 (Thursday, 5 November)
• just before we start... agenda now reflecting last TC's agreements (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Sunday, 1 November)
• ERRATA in examples for Query (Saturday, 31 October)
• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-10-27 - 10:00 Eastern = *14:00* UK time !!! (Monday, 26 October)
• Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-10-27 - 10:00 Eastern = *14:00* UK time !!! (Monday, 26 October)
• First (rough) F2F agenda (Friday, 23 October)
• SPARQL Update 1.1, SPARQL Query Language 1.1 --> SPARQL 1.1 Update, SPARQL 1.1 Query Language (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Protocol changes (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Protocol changes (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: Reformatted SPARQL REC (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Wednesday, 7 October)
• minutes from today... (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] A few comments on RDFS Entailment section (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Agenda Telecon 2009-10-06 (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] A few comments on RDFS Entailment section (Monday, 5 October)
• ACTION-101 completed: Review of SPARQL 1.1 (Sunday, 4 October)
• ACTION-109 completed: Review for Service Description (Sunday, 4 October)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Editing documents (Monday, 19 October)

Birte Glimm

• Re: SPARQL WG - 2009-12-22 Agenda (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: ACTION summary (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: Comment on: entailment (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Saturday, 19 December)
• SPARQL F2F3 (Thursday, 17 December)
• Provide a high-level changelog summarising what has happened since FPWD in entailment (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2009-12-01 Agenda (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Tuesday, 24 November)
• [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: RDB2RDF Working Group (Monday, 23 November)
• [TF-ENT] No entailment regimes telecon on Friday (Thursday, 19 November)
• [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon summary (Friday, 13 November)
• [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon today (Friday, 13 November)
• Location for F2F number 3 (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: example query on aggregates in SPARQL/Query Section 2 (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: example query on aggregates in SPARQL/Query Section 2 (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Thursday, 29 October)
• Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Thursday, 29 October)
• Closed open but done actions (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [TF-ENT] Telecon for the Entailment Regimes Task Force (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: Gathering issues for F2F (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: Editing documents (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Editing documents (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Sunday, 18 October)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: Questions about Update 1.1 (Friday, 16 October)
• Editing documents (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Review of the entailment document (Tuesday, 13 October)
• [TF-ENT] new conditions for RDF(S) solutions (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] redundant blank nodes (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: Data in turtle syntax (Friday, 9 October)
• Data in turtle syntax (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] redundant blank nodes (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Thursday, 8 October)
• [TF-ENT] redundant blank nodes (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] A few comments on RDFS Entailment section (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Wednesday, 7 October)
• [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] A few comments on RDFS Entailment section (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] A few comments on RDFS Entailment section (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: Error handling (including with entailment regimes) (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] A few comments on RDFS Entailment section (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 (Monday, 5 October)
• Review of SPARQL 1.1 (Friday, 2 October)

Chimezie Ogbuji

• Re: Response (Monday, 14 December)
• Response (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: SPARQL Agenda - Tues. 10-November-2009 (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-10-27 - 10:00 Eastern = *14:00* UK time !!! (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday, October 13, 2009 (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: ACTION-115: Note on proxy graph URI (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: ACTION-115: Note on proxy graph URI (Monday, 12 October)
• re: Is a graph an information resource? (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: HTTP Update and HTTP verbs (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: REST and HTTP Update (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: REST and HTTP Update (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: Comments on RDF Update Protocol for HTTP (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime & inconsistencies (Thursday, 1 October)

Gregory Williams

• Re: Review of Service Description document (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: Review of Service Description document (Wednesday, 23 December)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Draft response to LD-2 (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: SD vocab updates: dataset descriptions (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Draft response to LD-2 (Tuesday, 15 December)
• changes to service description document (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Draft response to LD-2 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: SD vocab updates: dataset descriptions (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: SD vocab updates: dataset descriptions (Wednesday, 2 December)
• SD vocab updates: dataset descriptions (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: GROUP_CONCAT (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Sunday, 18 October)
• Re: HTTP update : default graph (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Questions about Update 1.1 (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: updated service description document (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: updated service description document (Tuesday, 13 October)
• updated service description document (Sunday, 11 October)

Ian Jacobs

• And one more [Was: Call for Exclusions: SPARQL 1.1 (Various)] (Thursday, 29 October)
• Call for Exclusions: SPARQL 1.1 (Various) (Thursday, 22 October)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Goodbye from me (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: Review of Service Description document (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Saturday, 19 December)
• [TF-ENT] Review of the Entailment regime document, 2009-12 (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: Team action request (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Draft response to LD-2 (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Possible Duplicate? (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: SD vocab updates: dataset descriptions (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Draft response to Rob Vesse (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Draft response to Rob Vesse (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: RDB2RDF Working Group (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re 2: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: [TF-PP] Minor comments on the current document (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] OWL Direct Semantics added (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: [TF-PP] Document now in CVS (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: [TF-PP] Document now in CVS (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: [TF-PP] Document now in CVS (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: SD vocab updates: dataset descriptions (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: SD vocab updates: dataset descriptions (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: [TF-PP] Document now in CVS (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon today (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: Draft response for " Inferencing on graph patterns" comment of Simon Reinhardt (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Draft response for " Inferencing on graph patterns" comment of Simon Reinhardt (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Draft response for " Inferencing on graph patterns" comment of Simon Reinhardt (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon (Saturday, 7 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon (Wednesday, 4 November)
• purely administrative: management of comments (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: ISWC (was: First (rough) F2F agenda) (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: error in the status boilerplate text... (Friday, 23 October)
• error in the status boilerplate text... (Friday, 23 October)
• Small note to editors (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - October 20, 2009 (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday, October 13, 2009 (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Review of the entailment document (Wednesday, 14 October)
• [TF-ENT] Review of the entailment document (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Monday, 12 October)
• Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] redundant blank nodes (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Who will be at ISWC? (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: Question about literals in subject position (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: Entailment Regimes Doc (Thursday, 1 October)

Ivan Mikhailov

• Re: INSERT/DELETE Update syntax (Thursday, 8 October)

Kendall Clark

• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Thursday, 29 October)

Kjetil Kjernsmo

• Goodbye from me (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: Example updates (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: Example updates (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Sunday, 22 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Sunday, 22 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: More on the evil examples... and "What really happened to Limit per Resource?" (Sunday, 8 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Sunday, 8 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Friday, 6 November)
• ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: ISSUE-47: Is MODIFY syntax required? (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: ISSUE-47: Is MODIFY syntax required? (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: ISSUE-47: Is MODIFY syntax required? (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: ACTION-115: Note on proxy graph URI (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: Is a graph an information resource? (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: HTTP Update and HTTP verbs (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: ACTION-115: Note on proxy graph URI (Sunday, 11 October)
• Re: ACTION-115: Note on proxy graph URI (Sunday, 11 October)
• ACTION-115: Note on proxy graph URI (Sunday, 11 October)
• Is a graph an information resource? (Saturday, 10 October)
• Re: Comments on RDF Update Protocol for HTTP (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: REST and HTTP Update (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: REST and HTTP Update (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: REST and HTTP Update (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: Query 1.1 FPWD (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: REST and HTTP Update (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: REST and HTTP Update (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Review of HTTP Update (Tuesday, 6 October)

Lee Feigenbaum

• Re: styling summary (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: styling summary (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: styling summary (Tuesday, 29 December)
• styling summary (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: "Proposed W3C Typographic Conventions" (Wednesday, 23 December)
• Re: rq25 aggregate functions (Wednesday, 23 December)
• Re: ACTION summary (Wednesday, 23 December)
• Re: Goodbye from me (Wednesday, 23 December)
• Re: Provide a high-level changelog summarising what has happened since FPWD in entailment (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: important issues on rdf-update to put on the TC before christmas? (Monday, 14 December)
• SPARQL WG - 2009-12-15 Agenda (Saturday, 12 December)
• SPARQL WG minutes 2009-12-08 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Example updates (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: [TF-PP] Document now in CVS (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: [TF-PP] Minor comments on the current document (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: RDF datasets for SPARQL Update? (Monday, 23 November)
• RDF datasets for SPARQL Update? (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Saturday, 21 November)
• last week's minute and next week's agenda (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: CommentResponse:ldodds-query-1 ready for review (Tuesday, 17 November)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Nov. 17, 2009 (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: DISTINCT with aggregates (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: scope of alias variables (Friday, 13 November)
• scope of alias variables (was: Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F) (Friday, 13 November)
• subqueries in FILTERs / EXISTS in FILTERs (was: Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F) (Friday, 13 November)
• requiring aliases for projected expressions (was: Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F) (Friday, 13 November)
• mixed datatypes and aggregates (was: Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F) (Friday, 13 November)
• DISTINCT with aggregates (was: Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F) (Friday, 13 November)
• HAVING vs. FILTER (was: Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F) (Friday, 13 November)
• F2F3 (Friday, 13 November)
• scribe list reset (Thursday, 12 November)
• Minutes from 2009-11-10 telecon (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Potential design space of LET/assignment (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Potential design space of LET/assignment (was: Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F) (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F (Tuesday, 10 November)
• SPARQL Agenda - Tues. 10-November-2009 (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: Fwd: Some comments on the SPARQL 1.1 draft documents (Saturday, 7 November)
• Re: More on the evil examples... and "What really happened to Limit per Resource?" (Saturday, 7 November)
• Rough minutes from last week's meeting (2009-10-27) (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: First (rough) F2F agenda (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: error in the status boilerplate text... (Friday, 23 October)
• Six SPARQL 1.1 Working Drafts Published (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Small note to editors (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Fwd: Protocol extensions for federated querying (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Protocol changes (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Gathering issues for F2F (Monday, 19 October)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - October 20, 2009 (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Editing documents (Monday, 19 October)
• Protocol changes (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday, October 13, 2009 (Monday, 12 October)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday, October 13, 2009 (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: Versioning (again, sorry!) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Versioning (again, sorry!) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Versioning (again, sorry!) (Thursday, 8 October)
• [Fwd: Reminder: TPAC fees increase Tues. 6 Oct.---Registration reminders and AV WBS for the 2-6 November 2009 W3C TPAC] (Saturday, 3 October)
• Who will be at ISWC? (Thursday, 1 October)

Luke Wilson-Mawer

• Possible regrets for today (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Regrets 2009/17/11 (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Update review (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Update review (Friday, 16 October)

Marcelo Arenas

• Re: RDB2RDF Working Group (Tuesday, 24 November)

Matt Perry

• Re: [TF-PP] Property Path FPWD (Monday, 21 December)

Olivier Corby

• Re: Comment on: rq25 (Monday, 21 December)
• Comment on: entailment (Monday, 21 December)
• Comment on: rq25 (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: SPARQL WG - 2009-12-15 Agenda (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: agenda for tomorrow... (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: scope of alias variables (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: More on the evil examples... and "What really happened to Limit per Resource?" (Monday, 9 November)

Orri Erling

• RE: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Tuesday, 17 November)
• RE: Views on the outcomes of F2F (Thursday, 12 November)
• RE: SPARQL WG Agenda - October 20, 2009 (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Regrets (Monday, 12 October)

Paul Gearon

• Re: Example updates (Monday, 21 December)
• Update on Update (Saturday, 19 December)
• Re: Example updates (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Updates (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Example updates (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Example updates (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Example updates (Thursday, 3 December)
• Possible Duplicate? (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Example updates (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Example updates (Thursday, 3 December)
• Example updates (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Updates (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Updates (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Updates (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Availability tomorrow (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: last week's minute and next week's agenda (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: Potential design space of LET/assignment (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: HTTP Update : graph naming (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)
• Fwd: DAWG test case structure (Monday, 26 October)
• ISWC (was: First (rough) F2F agenda) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: Fwd: Protocol extensions for federated querying (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Fwd: Protocol extensions for federated querying (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: ISSUE-47: Is MODIFY syntax required? (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Update review (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Questions about Update 1.1 (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Versioning (again, sorry!) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Versioning (again, sorry!) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Polleres, Axel

• Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2009-10-27 - 10:00 Eastern = *14:00* UK time !!! (Tuesday, 27 October)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: [pedantic-web] ERRATA in examples for Query (Saturday, 31 October)

Sandro Hawke

• "Proposed W3C Typographic Conventions" (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: F2F3 (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes telecon today (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: [TF-ENT] URIs for entailment regimes in service descriptions (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)

Seaborne, Andy

• RE: The syntax of the SELECT clause. (Friday, 30 October)
• RE: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)
• RE: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)
• Design of SELECT expressions (Friday, 30 October)
• RE: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Friday, 30 October)
• RE: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs (Thursday, 29 October)
• Confusing SPARQL/Update request (Thursday, 29 October)
• RE: First (rough) F2F agenda (Thursday, 29 October)
• RE: Protocol extensions for federated querying (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: ISSUE-47: Is MODIFY syntax required? (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: Gathering issues for F2F (Tuesday, 20 October)
• SPARQL 1.1 grammar updated (Tuesday, 20 October)
• RE: Editing documents (Monday, 19 October)
• RE: Questions about Update 1.1 (Sunday, 18 October)
• RE: Questions about Update 1.1 (Sunday, 18 October)
• RE: Questions about Update 1.1 (Sunday, 18 October)
• RE: HTTP update : default graph (Sunday, 18 October)
• RE: Questions about Update 1.1 (Sunday, 18 October)
• RE: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Saturday, 17 October)
• RE: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Saturday, 17 October)
• RE: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Saturday, 17 October)
• RE: Questions about Update 1.1 (Thursday, 15 October)
• RE: Reformatted SPARQL REC (Thursday, 15 October)
• SPARQL/Update and RDF collections (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Reformatted SPARQL REC (Wednesday, 14 October)
• HTTP update : default graph (Wednesday, 14 October)
• RE: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday, October 13, 2009 (Wednesday, 14 October)
• RE: ACTION-115: Note on proxy graph URI (Tuesday, 13 October)
• RE: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday, October 13, 2009 (Tuesday, 13 October)
• RE: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Tuesday, 13 October)
• RE: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday, October 13, 2009 (Monday, 12 October)
• RE: HTTP Update and HTTP verbs (Monday, 12 October)
• RE: Re 2: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Monday, 12 October)
• RE: [TF-ENT] redundant blank nodes (Monday, 12 October)
• RE: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Monday, 12 October)
• RE: updated service description document (Monday, 12 October)
• RE: ACTION-115: Note on proxy graph URI (Sunday, 11 October)
• RE: INSERT/DELETE Update syntax (Friday, 9 October)
• RE: [TF-PP] Questions on Property Paths (Friday, 9 October)
• RE: [TF-ENT] redundant blank nodes (Friday, 9 October)
• RE: [TF-PP] Questions on Property Paths (Friday, 9 October)
• RE: INSERT/DELETE Update syntax (Friday, 9 October)
• RE: Data in turtle syntax (Friday, 9 October)
• RE: Versioning (again, sorry!) (Thursday, 8 October)
• RE: [TF-PP] Possible starting points (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Query 1.1 FPWD (Wednesday, 7 October)
• RE: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Wednesday, 7 October)
• RE: REST and HTTP Update (Wednesday, 7 October)
• RE: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Wednesday, 7 October)
• RE: [TF-ENT] A few comments on RDFS Entailment section (Tuesday, 6 October)
• RE: [TF-ENT] A few comments on RDFS Entailment section (Tuesday, 6 October)
• RE: ACTION-101 completed: Review of SPARQL 1.1 (Monday, 5 October)
• RE: Review of SPARQL 1.1 (Monday, 5 October)
• [TF-ENT] A few comments on RDFS Entailment section (Monday, 5 October)
• Comments on Service Description (Monday, 5 October)
• RE: Definition of Basic Graph Pattern Matching & Pattern Instance Mapping (Monday, 5 October)
• Error handling (including with entailment regimes) (Monday, 5 October)
• Comments on RDF Update Protocol for HTTP (Thursday, 1 October)
• RE: Question about literals in subject position (Thursday, 1 October)
• RE: Entailment Regimes Doc (Thursday, 1 October)

Simon Schenk

• Re: Update review (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Update review (Thursday, 15 October)
• regrets (Tuesday, 6 October)

SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-49: Is a graph an information resource (Tuesday, 20 October)
• ISSUE-48: Is DELETE too verbose? (Tuesday, 20 October)
• ISSUE-47: Is MODIFY syntax required? (Tuesday, 20 October)
• ISSUE-46: Can INSERTS, DELETES, and other 'subupdates' be nested inside update language queries? (Tuesday, 20 October)
• ISSUE-45: Can INSERTS, DELETES, and other 'subupdates' be nested inside SELECT queries? (Tuesday, 20 October)
• ISSUE-43: should entailment-regimes be declared over the whole dataset or individual graphs? (Wednesday, 7 October)

Steve Harris

• Re: Update short forms (from ISSUE-24) (Saturday, 26 December)
• Re: Update short forms (from ISSUE-24) (Wednesday, 23 December)
• Re: ACTION summary (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: rq25 aggregate functions (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: rq25 aggregate functions (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: rq25 aggregate functions (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: Comment on: rq25 (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: Comment on: rq25 (Monday, 21 December)
• rq25 aggregate functions (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: SPARQL WG - 2009-12-15 Agenda (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Example updates (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Example updates (Friday, 4 December)
• Appologies (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Updates (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Example updates (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Draft response to Rob Vesse (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Draft response to Rob Vesse (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Example updates (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Draft response to Rob Vesse (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [TF-PP] Document now in CVS (Tuesday, 24 November)
• At risk for todays telecon. (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: RDF datasets for SPARQL Update? (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: RDF datasets for SPARQL Update? (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: last week's minute and next week's agenda (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: last week's minute and next week's agenda (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: "Unbound" in SPARQL (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: "Unbound" in SPARQL (was Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: "Unbound" in SPARQL (was Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: "Unbound" in SPARQL (was Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: "Unbound" in SPARQL (was Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: "Unbound" in SPARQL (was Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name) (Monday, 16 November)
• "Unbound" in SPARQL (was Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name) (Sunday, 15 November)
• Re: Semantics of SUM (Sunday, 15 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Sunday, 15 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: Semantics of SUM (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: scope of alias variables (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: DISTINCT with aggregates (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [TF-LIB] COALESCE is an unhelpful choice of name (Friday, 13 November)
• XML Spec and local.css (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: HAVING vs. FILTER (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: Semantics of SUM (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: requiring aliases for projected expressions (was: Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F) (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: Semantics of SUM (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Semantics of SUM (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Potential design space of LET/assignment (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Semantics of SUM (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Location for F2F number 3 (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: HTTP Update : graph naming (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Views on the outcomes of F2F (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: More on the evil examples... and "What really happened to Limit per Resource?" (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Sunday, 8 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Sunday, 8 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Sunday, 8 November)
• Re: ISSUE-48: Less verbose delete syntax (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Draft Response for "Comments on SPARQL 1.1 WD 20091022" (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: example query on subselect in SPARQL/Query Section 3 (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Draft Response for "Comments on SPARQL 1.1 WD 20091022" (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Some comments on the SPARQL 1.1 draft documents (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Confusing SPARQL/Update request (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: First (rough) F2F agenda (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: First (rough) F2F agenda (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: GROUP_CONCAT (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: GROUP_CONCAT (Tuesday, 20 October)
• GROUP_CONCAT (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Gathering issues for F2F (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - October 20, 2009 (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Questions about Update 1.1 (Sunday, 18 October)
• Re: Questions about Update 1.1 (Sunday, 18 October)
• Re: Questions about Update 1.1 (Friday, 16 October)
• Update grammar oddities (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Questions about Update 1.1 (Friday, 16 October)
• Questions about Update 1.1 (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Update review (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: ACTION-115: Note on proxy graph URI (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: ACTION-115: Note on proxy graph URI (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: HTTP Update and HTTP verbs (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: ACTION-115: Note on proxy graph URI (Sunday, 11 October)
• Re: ACTION-115: Note on proxy graph URI (Sunday, 11 October)
• Re: INSERT/DELETE Update syntax (Saturday, 10 October)
• Re: [TF-PP] Questions on Property Paths (Saturday, 10 October)
• Re: REST and HTTP Update (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [TF-PP] Questions on Property Paths (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: INSERT/DELETE Update syntax (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: INSERT/DELETE Update syntax (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: REST and HTTP Update (Thursday, 8 October)
• INSERT/DELETE Update syntax (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Thursday, 8 October)
• [TF-PP] Questions on Property Paths (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [TF-ENT] Querying datasets with default plus named graphs (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: REST and HTTP Update (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Versioning (again, sorry!) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: REST and HTTP Update (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Versioning (again, sorry!) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Update review (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: REST and HTTP Update (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: REST and HTTP Update (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: Comments on RDF Update Protocol for HTTP (Tuesday, 6 October)
• HTTP Update and HTTP verbs (Tuesday, 6 October)
• REST and HTTP Update (Tuesday, 6 October)

Tommi Koivula

• Regrets 2009-12-22 (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Regrets for todays teleconf (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Introducing myself (Tuesday, 10 November)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 December 2009 21:30:15 UTC