- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:13:33 -0500
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
- CC: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Kendall Clark wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote: > >> I'm not wedded to COALESCE and I recognize it's an obtuse word that's >> confusing to non-SQL-heads and probably even more confusing to >> non-native-English speakers. >> >> ...But I don't like any of these proposed choices either :) > > How about GATHER (which is a pretty good synonym of "coalesce")? It sounds a bit like something you do with berries and twigs :-), but I definitely prefer it to the other proposals, and probably indifferent to it vs. COALESCE (pro is it's a much nicer word, con is we're inventing something new). Lee
Received on Friday, 13 November 2009 17:14:16 UTC