- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:11:05 +0000
- To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> Leigh Dodds suggested a built-in mechanism for POSTing RDF graphs to a > container resource which then responds with a 201 such that the server can > determine the URI used to store the payload as a new, named RDF graph and > indicate this to the client. The changes were made to 4.3 HTTP POST There now seem to be two concepts for "container" - graph store and graph. It would be worth pulling this out explicitly. Where is the "insertion use case" that is mentioned? Andy
Received on Monday, 14 December 2009 22:11:30 UTC