W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [pedantic-web] ERRATA in examples for Query

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:17:37 +0000
Message-ID: <4AF00341.2060205@talis.com>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Let's wait until the discussion on what to do about vCards has concluded.

Reading their mailing list, some of the proposed courses of action will 
cause an incompatible change to a lot of vcard data; the SPARQL examples 
are a side issue. There's no rush for SPARQL here so let's wait to see 
what the changes turn out to be then decide.  It's editorial anyway.


Axel Polleres wrote:
> Hi all,
> small thing which we may want to add to the errata:
> The pedantic-web folks [1] pointed me to some errors in:
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0#
> which is not adhering to linked data principles, see [2] for details.
> I'd prefer to fix such issues in the upcoming version, i.e. not 
> dereferencing example
> vocabularies/namespaces that have broken RDF from W3C specs. Ideally, we 
> can resolve
> that by fixing  http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0#
> which -- as [2] suggests -- doesn't seem to be trivial, since we aren't 
> sure who can
> actually fix it. otherwise, we may just want to change the example to 
> something else than vcard?
> best,
> Axel
> 1. http://pedantic-web.org/
> 2. 
> http://groups.google.com/group/pedantic-web/browse_thread/thread/229de280636a7614 
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2009 10:18:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:57 UTC