- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:18:27 +0100
- To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I've had a quick look at the HTTP Update document, though nothing that would count as a review. I share Kjetil's concerns about the REST thing, but on the other hand I think it's a very important aspect of the protocol. An alternative, which I believe to be RESTful is to target requests to $endpoint + uriencode($graph) This is compatible with PUT and POST semantics, and I believe that it conforms to REST ideals, though that may be arguable. Example: http://localhost:8080/data/http%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%2Fdata.rdf - Steve
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2009 16:18:59 UTC