- From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:40:09 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Andy, others, I reworked the conditions on solutions for RDF and RDFS entailment and I hope they make more sense now. I added a new example for both RDF and RDFS entailment that especially considers blank nodes and will hopefully be helpful in validating whether the current definition works as we expect. I am still not very clear about blank nodes in pattern matching, so I am grateful about any comments. Birte -- Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 306 Computing Laboratory Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QD United Kingdom +44 (0)1865 283529
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 16:40:42 UTC