- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:13:31 +0000
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 14/11/2009 06:39, Steve Harris wrote: > On 14 Nov 2009, at 05:48, Alexandre Passant wrote: >> Based on your previous email "COALESCE (or whatever it's called) takes >> 1 or more arguments and returns the first of its arguments that is >> bound to a value (i.e. first argument that is not unbound and not a >> type error)." >> >> So what about FIRST_BOUND or something explicit like that ? > > "First" is a bit ambiguous. Lexically? (where?), chronologically? > > I thought about LEFTMOST(), but that's not great either. > > - Steve > LEFTMOST is possible. A word with a firstness about it would be good. I think "first" for "first in list" is clear enough. FIRST_SAFE seems accurate albeit long. FIRST_VALID Just SAFE? More emphasis on it's protecting role than the order. PROTECT? Andy
Received on Saturday, 14 November 2009 12:13:45 UTC