- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:33:16 +0100
- To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 18 Oct 2009, at 17:27, Seaborne, Andy wrote: [snip] > "Skolemize" might be a bit unfriendly (maybe a good idea given the > nature of the usage) > > I prefer not using a keyword of the language but only a custom > function form to emphasis the fact it's a non-core feature. > sparql:ref(?x) ? Good point. > May or may not apply to literals -- if it does, it returns the > literal. Yep, well if it is defined as a skolem function then that would be correct behaviour, as I understand it. sparql:ref is fine, but if this is the only way to delete bNodes in DELETE DATA then it might be a bit odd if either a) we don't say how you can do that, or b) the doc reference a WG note. - Steve
Received on Sunday, 18 October 2009 18:33:45 UTC