- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
- Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:25:23 +0200
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Tuesday 6. October 2009 18:54:15 Steve Harris wrote: > With the behaviour above the required sequence would be: > > GET $resource > IF status is 404 > PUT triples to $resource > ELSE > POST triples to $resource > > with the potential for PUT/PUT races, which lose data, as opposed to > just > > POST triples to $resource > > Which the store has a greater chance of processing correctly, and is > simpler. I agree very much with this view, and so I propose that we remove the note and adopt this. Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo kjetil@kjernsmo.net http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
Received on Friday, 9 October 2009 22:25:57 UTC