Birte Glimm wrote: > >> Is the implication that inference only happens within a (named) graph? > > Good point. I have to check on that and see whether this is clear from > the SPARQL 1.0 spec or whether we have to specify something for that > in the ent. regimes. The notion of named or default graph is not used > in the OWL context. I have never seen it in the RDF(S) spec either > (maybe I forget), so if the SPARQL spec does not say anything, then we > have to address that I guess. Any clues? > You did not forget:-) Names and default graphs are not concepts handled by RDFS currently. Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdfReceived on Thursday, 1 October 2009 07:58:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:57 UTC