- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:24:39 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
That's a definite improvement : IE works (uniquely, it does not display ) Chrome displays something from the web but without local.css which gives me some hope it is some small matter that is wrong. Andy On 14/12/2009 06:37, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > I looked at this briefly and the only thing I noticed/fixed was that the > rq25.xml doctype line read > > <!DOCTYPE spec SYSTEM "xmlspec.dtd" [ > > > but xmlspec.dtd is in ../shared > > I changed it to > > <!DOCTYPE spec SYSTEM "../shared/xmlspec.dtd" [ > > but that didn't seem to have much effect. > > I don't know enough about this to be more productive right now, but I'll > try again during the week. > > Lee > > Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >> >> >> >> --------------- >> >> The biggest issue currently is getting the XSLT to work consistently >> in browsers from the web and from file: >> >> Chrome works for file:rq25.xml but gives a blank page with http: from >> the CVS area. >> >> FF displays file:rq25.xml as if it were HTML, >> FF displays http:rq25.xml without the style sheet applied. >> >> IE generates an error in both cases: >> """ >> The system cannot locate the object specified. Error processing >> resource 'http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/xmls... >> """ >> >> Safari works in both cases. >> >> >> >> On 13/12/2009 21:04, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> >>> On 08/12/2009 16:14, Axel Polleres wrote: >>>> This is just a friendly reminder to the editors to send us input on >>>> issues they >>>> would like to prioritise to spend some TC time on before Christmas as >>>> they neeed >>>> resolution before going to next WD publication. >>> >>> Steve and I didn't come up with anything for query beyond the items >>> slated for this week's telecon (scope of aliased variables; custom >>> syntax for aggregates). >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Axel >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. >>>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email >>>> ______________________________________________________________________ >> >> > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 14 December 2009 09:24:59 UTC