- From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 14:29:04 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi all, for the entailment regimes we discussed whether it would be possible/sensible to allow other syntaxes than RDF XML for the queried data. A natural choice apart from RDF XML that is not specific to certain entailment regimes would be turtle syntax. Can I already specify my RDF data in turtle and query that in accordance with the spec? If not in accordance with the spec, do systems support turtle input? This is obviously not normative. Any system might reject non-RDF XML input, but many systems might happily take it. If not even turtle is allowed, are there any plans for doing that as an optional syntax? For other entailment regimes other syntaxes might also be useful, e.g., functional style syntax or OWL XML for systems that support some form of OWL entailment. All OWL syntaxes can easily be converted into RDF XML, so one could live with purely RDF XML, only RIF would be in trouble since RIF cannot be represented in RDF XML. Birte -- Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 306 Computing Laboratory Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QD United Kingdom +44 (0)1865 283529
Received on Friday, 9 October 2009 13:29:36 UTC