- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:43:18 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 08/12/2009 16:10, Axel Polleres wrote: >> but I don't know a use case that requires mining bnodes. What had you >> in mind? (noting we can add this later but can't remove it once spec'ed) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > I am ok with that, and the implied action that if that is really needed, > <chairhatoff> I</chairhatoff> (or anybody else who thinks it's worthwhile) > should come up with more concrete use cases... > > The use case<chairhatoff> I</chairhatoff> had in mind was the query on > [top of p.6, 1] which creates some bnode to model co-author relationships. > > Let me see what<chairhatoff> I</chairhatoff> get back from ACTION-133 > and depending on the outcome<chairhatoff> I</chairhatoff> will summarise > resp. use cases all in one. > > Axel > > 1. http://www.polleres.net/publications/poll-etal-2007.pdf There is a related issue about introducing new URIs where the URI string i built by string operations. We had that as part of TF-LIB - e.g. IRI(expr), expr is string valued. Andy
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 16:43:45 UTC