- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:14:24 -0700
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Cc: pedantic-web@googlegroups.com
Hi all, small thing which we may want to add to the errata: The pedantic-web folks [1] pointed me to some errors in: http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0# which is not adhering to linked data principles, see [2] for details. I'd prefer to fix such issues in the upcoming version, i.e. not dereferencing example vocabularies/namespaces that have broken RDF from W3C specs. Ideally, we can resolve that by fixing http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0# which -- as [2] suggests -- doesn't seem to be trivial, since we aren't sure who can actually fix it. otherwise, we may just want to change the example to something else than vcard? best, Axel 1. http://pedantic-web.org/ 2. http://groups.google.com/group/pedantic-web/browse_thread/thread/229de280636a7614
Received on Saturday, 31 October 2009 20:15:10 UTC