- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:35:05 +0000
- To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 8 Nov 2009, at 21:33, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > On Saturday 7. November 2009 04:12:03 Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >>> This very use case was mentioned very early in the game as something >>> several people wanted to have: >>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:LimitPerResource >>> and, if I remember correctly, the champions for that use case (Alex, >>> Kjetil) settled their fights for this feature purely on the >>> observation that it would be doable with subselect. > > Yeah, reluctantly, as Steve said in the F2F1 something like "trust > me, this > is going to be simple enough to do, we need it too". And it is, just using aggregates not sub-SELECTS. Mea culpa. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK +44(0)20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Monday, 9 November 2009 10:35:44 UTC