Re: Alternative Syntaxes for BGPs

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

> I do think a member submission is technically doable, as long as the
> SPARQL WG declares the work to be out of scope.

My org wouldn't support doing this as a member submission, FWIW. It's
just not that scale of thing, IMO.

> But the normal approach, I think, would be for someone to prepare it and
> show it the WG, and if the WG says "sorry, we don't have time to
> actually work on this right now" (or they just don't want to), then they
> publish it as a WG note.  For example, as I recall this is what happened
> with LBase [1] in RDF Core and OWL 1 XML [2] in WebOnt.

And with SPARQL Results in JSON.

It would be ideal, though, if we could avoid prejudging this as DOA,
at least before it actually arrives. :>

Cheers,
Kendall