- From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:00:24 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi all, I manually converted my wiki page for entailment regimes into an xml page in the CVS repository, but I got the impression that we seem to be using different methodologies. Lee said that from the xml page a static HTML page will be generated, but most editors seem to be working directly on their html file and do not use the xml file, so what are we supposed to use? We should have a somehow uniform process for editing the documents. The xml uses an xsl file to render in the browser and the style information are mainly there, but we have several copies of the xsl file and it is quite specific to the xml spec from which I assume this file was originally copied. In the xml file you can only use commands that are defined in the xsl file, e.g., I can write <rfc2119>MAY</rfc2119> to get a bold MAY, but I cannot write <b>MAY</b>, which uses normal HTML commands as the wiki does. If we want to use the xml/xsl files, we should have one central file and adapt it to he SPARQL needs and all use that I would think. If we want to use HTML, we should still use a consistent style and then I would have to know which css file I should use. Cheers, Birte -- Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 306 Computing Laboratory Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QD United Kingdom +44 (0)1865 283529
Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2009 15:00:58 UTC