- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:50:06 +0100
- To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I've just read through the document Andy posted: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:PropertyPaths and I have a couple of questions: Is the () construct particularly useful? Without have tried it it does seems like it might make the design much harder to implement that if it was absent. Though I'd welcome evidence to the contrary. "Cycles in paths are possible and are handled." in any particular way? Note: there's a stray <td> in the Syntax Form table. - Steve
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 11:51:47 UTC