Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday, October 13, 2009

I took care of the minute generation process this morning; consider it
as a price I paid because I did not pay enough attention on RRS being
present:-)

Minutes are at:

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-10-13

Ivan

Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> Minutes delayed.
> 
> We didn't have rrsagent so we need to manually insert the IRC chat logs (perl run over Ivan's personal IRC client logs).
> 
> CVS is down at the moment so we can't today.
> 
>  Andy
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lee Feigenbaum [mailto:figtree@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum
>> Sent: 12 October 2009 19:53
>> To: Seaborne, Andy
>> Cc: SPARQL Working Group
>> Subject: Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday, October 13, 2009
>>
>> Thanks, Andy. Both are spot-on suggestions and I'll add them to the agenda.
>>
>> Lee
>>
>> Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-
>> request@w3.org]
>>>> On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum
>>>> Sent: 12 October 2009 19:13
>>>> To: SPARQL Working Group
>>>> Subject: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday, October 13, 2009
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Axel and I are both swamped (as I'm sure many of you are), so apologies
>>>> for the late agenda.
>>>>
>>>> Our goals tomorrow are pretty clear:
>>>>
>>>> + Review state of documents with respect to FPWD - I suspect we're not
>>>> ready to move many forward, but we need to spend time with the editors
>>>> figuring out whta must be done, so this is our primary goal
>>>>
>>>> + Discuss open issues from mailing list
>>>>    * HTTP Update goals
>>>>    * INSERT/DELETE syntax
>>>>    * Entailment issues?
>>>>
>>>> Please reply to this with other high priority issues that we should look
>> at.
>>> 1--
>>> I hesitate to mention it but it would be useful to sort out the question of
>> naming/versioning if it might affect publication naming, any intro/overview
>> text in the FPWD and talking about it at ISWC and around F2F.
>>> Sorry.
>>>
>>> 2--
>>> Not a blocker for FPWD for Query/1.1 but this has been pending for a while
>> now:
>>>  • Aggregate design questions (from [2])
>>>   • Custom aggregates
>>>    • Bare URI or keyword?
>>>    • DISTINCT? *?
>>>   • Mixed datatypes and unknown values
>>>   • Which aggregates?
>>>
>>> Suggest gathering input for the last point only, if time.
>>>
>>>  Andy
>>>
>>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-
>> dawg/2009OctDec/0042.html
>>> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-
>> dawg/2009JulSep/0248.html
>>>> I'll stick this up on the wiki, but probably not until tonight.
>>>>
>>>> Lee
>>>>
>>>> # ate of Call: Tuesday September 29, 2009
>>>> # Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
>>>> # Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
>>>> # Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
>>>> # Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
>>>> # Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
>>>> # IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql
>>>> ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
>>>> # Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
>>>> (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
>>>> #
>>>> # Duration: 90 minutes

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf