Thanks Greg. This indeed clarifies. And I am fine...
Ivan
Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:24 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>
>> Heh:-) I was asking myself exactly the same question:-) That is why I
>> asked Greg to give an example...
>>
>> I guess
>>
>> sd:Service sd:defaultDataset [ ... ] .
>>
>> (which is the current example) can also say
>>
>> sd:Service sd:defaultDataset <URI> .
>>
>> but I realized that does not necessarily sound right. <URI> is clearly
>> not the URI of the dataset itself, but a description thereof. So the
>> term's name is not really fine...
>>
>> Again, I think an example would clarify Greg's thoughts...
>
> With the new changes, the example would be:
>
> [] a sd:Service ;
> sd:defaultDatasetDescription <URI> .
>
> If the service description document contains more information (the actual dataset description) about <URI>, then you're done. If it doesn't and you want more details, you can try dereferencing <URI> to get the description.
>
> Does that clear things up?
>
> .greg
>
>
--
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf