- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 18:17:44 +0100
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: "SPARQL WG" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 5 Oct 2009, at 13:35, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> Birte,
>
> 1/ A simple example involving the RDFS vocabulary subClassOf or
> subPropertyOf would be useful in showing the reader what is covered.
>
> 2/ Scoping Graph: it would be good to show the scoping graph in the
> discussion points.
>
> 3/ Boolean queries.
>
> Doesn't the same applies to any BGP with no named variables, so
> { [] :p :o } has an empty domain for sigma.
>
> 4/ DESCRIBE: The result of BGP matching are combined using the
> algebra and finally the query form generates the results. I wasn't
> clear why DESCRIBE might be different.
>
> 5/ What's the "signature of the scoping graph" - I did a google
> search and the top relevant hit was Design:EntailmentRegimes
> itself. Most were about signing graphs from the named graphs paper.
I assume Birte meant the vocabulary of the graph, cf. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#graphdefs?
>
> 6/ It would be useful to include RDF-entailment even if only to give
> it an IRI.
+1
> Andy
>
>
>
--
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland,
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Monday, 5 October 2009 17:18:20 UTC